No proof of Russian meddling in French and European elections

Summary

There is no proof of Russian interference in the French and European elections.

 

Disproof

Recurring disinformation narrative that there is no proof of Russian interference in the elections in Western countries - see examples here and here.

In reality, there is plenty of evidence of Russian state actors interfering in electoral processes.

Interference in French elections included personal attacks and mocking of the then presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron. Apart from biased reporting in the pro-Kremlin media, it included a made up story about Macron's offshore accounts (the so-called MacronGate) and an actual hack-and-leak operation. According to the Insider and Mediapart, the hacking was purported by the same GRU unit responsible for the hacking of the Democrats' servers in the US. For more information, see EUvsDisinfo analysis “Tackling disinformation à la française".

As for the elections to the European Parliament in May 2019, a joint report from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission on election interference clearly states that “the evidence collected revealed a continued and sustained disinformation activity by Russian sources aiming to suppress turnout and influence voter preferences" (p. 3). See here for our dedicated database of resources pertaining to Russian interference in Western elections and referenda.

Politicians who support the EU are routinely denigrated, ridiculed, or accused of corruption in pro-Kremlin media, while Eurosceptic voices are given prominence. In the weeks and months leading up to the European elections, these efforts have persisted in multiple languages.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 164
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24/08/2019
  • Language/target audience: French
  • Country: Russia, EU, France
  • Keywords: EU elections 2019, election meddling
  • Outlet: RT France time 0:57 - 1:11
see more

Even Trump and his colleagues don’t argue with the results of the Crimean referendum

Russia saw the US’s intention to establish an American or NATO naval base in Crimea. Russia managed to organise the defence of the Russian-speaking population of the peninsula and a referendum. Even Trump and his colleagues do not argue with the referendum’s results.

 

Disproof

The article contains several recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the annexation of Crimea.

The claim that NATO or the US was planning to base ships and missiles in Crimea is fiction. The idea has never been proposed, suggested or discussed within NATO.

The West develops the ‘old enemy image’ of Russia

[Context: The Russian proposal of a common “House of Europe” from Vladivostok to Lisbon]

The new-old enemy image of Russia serves the West above all to distract from its own social and democratic dismantling.

 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Russophobia and about Western belligerence towards Russia.

While aware of pro-Kremlin disinformation campaigns, the West is trying to keep open channels of communications and cooperation with Russia. For instance, NATO as the Western organisation created cooperation bodies – the Permanent Joint Council and the NATO-Russia Council – to embody its relationship with Russia. It also invited Russia to cooperate on missile defence. The Warsaw Summit Communique 2016 describes NATO's official policy towards Russia: "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia. But we cannot, and will not, compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe and North America rest."

Ukraine lost 10 million citizens after the social genocide in 2014-2019

During another “five-year madness” after the coup d’état, in 2014-2019 Ukraine lost almost 10 million citizens who were victims of the social genocide resulting from “100 successful reforms”. The people died or left the country searching for jobs.

Disproof

The recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about  Ukraine, its economy, and how it was ruined after 2014. It also repeats a disinformation narrative about the Euromaidan events in 2013-2014, portraying them as a coup d’état.

The spontaneous onset of the Euromaidan protests was an organic reaction by numerous parts of the Ukrainian population to former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the promised Association Agreement with the European Union in November 2013. See the full debunk of this disinformation claim here.