Disinfo: Nostradamus, Vanga, Hawking and Rothschilds all have predicted the coronavirus

Summary

Here is what Nostradamus wrote in one of his prophecies: “The great plague will not end in the coastal city until the innocent blood and death of the saint who was judged innocently and the noble lady who was insulted with flattery are redeemed.”

Many things coincided – the proximity to the water (Wuhan is located at the confluence of the Yangtze and Hanzhou rivers and is also known for its beautiful lake) and the scale of the plague (there is now virtually no place left untouched by the coronavirus). A noble woman who was abusively insulted was also found – 81-year-old Chinese Wu Yi, one of the most influential women in the world. At various times she held responsible positions in China: she was the mayor of Beijing, the minister of economy, a member of the State Council, the minister of health.

//

Vanga predicted by 2020 the activation of already well-forgotten diseases. However, exactly which disease it would be, was not named. The story itself is dangerous because it concerns the lives of many people. According to Vanga’s prophecy, the problem will not last long and should be completed by 2021.

//

In the last years of his life, Stephen Hawking shared many unusual and dangerous ideas with the community: for example, he talked about a new biological weapon of the viral type that would one day become uncontrollable and kill too many people. According to one version, the coronavirus is indeed a biological weapon allegedly developed in China’s secret laboratories, against Europe and the United States.

//

Many of the Rothschilds’ puzzles are still unsolved, though researchers believe that this influential clan warned the public in advance of an impending pandemic.

Disproof

Pro-Kremlin media are spreading systematic disinformation and confusion about the coronavirus. This article puts forward unfounded conspiracy theories, based on statements of various historical people, who allegedly predict the coronavirus pandemic. This is consistent with the recurring conspiracy theory that echoes pro-Kremlin disinformation about the artificial creation of the virus. Global epidemics have spread occasionally throughout human history, with or without the "predictions" of soothsayers.

There is no evidence that the coronavirus (COVID-19) was created in a laboratory. COVID-19 comes from a family of viruses that includes the common cold and viruses such as SARS and MERS. Coronaviruses are known to circulate in mammals and birds, and scientists have already suggested that COVID-19 originally came from bats. One of the previous coronaviruses that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, spread from bats to civet cats to humans.

A group of 27 prominent public health scientists have condemned rumours and conspiracy theories about the origin of the coronavirus outbreak: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." The authors of The Lancet statement note that scientists from several countries who have studied SARS-CoV-2, “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife," just like many other viruses that have recently emerged in humans. "Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus," the statement says.

See similar disinformation cases claiming that China Coronavirus was predicted by Nostradamus, that Baba Vanga predicted the coronavirus, that Bulgarian Sooth-sayer Baba Vanga predicted when the pandemic will end, that Baba Vanga predicted a Russian cure against coronavirus.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 223
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 25/11/2020
  • Outlet language(s) Georgian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Georgia, China
  • Keywords: coronavirus, Rothschild, Conspiracy theory
see more

Disinfo: NATO uses “Russian threat” to justify its actions

NATO is increasing its military presence near the Russian border. The Alliance is using the “Russian threat” to justify this actions. The Baltic States are also using the “Russian threat”. They are concluding high-cost security agreements with the US and are deploying NATO military contingents in their territories.

Moscow has said many times that it has no plans to attack any country. NATO knows it.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative, portraying NATO as having a belligerent agenda against Russia and claiming that the “Russian threat” is a false idea.

NATO does not seek confrontation with Russia. The Alliance indicated this position in the Brussels Summit Declaration in 2018. However, this declaration concludes that “Russia’s aggressive actions, including the threat and use of force to attain political goals, challenge the Alliance and are undermining Euro-Atlantic security and the rules-based international order”.

Disinfo: Soros' NGOs have brought Ukraine to the complete loss of sovereignty

The work of the Soros Foundation and some other Western organisations can be equated with the activities of the special services of foreign states. This is part of a hybrid war of the collective West against the countries of the post-Soviet space. In Ukraine, Soros’s scheme is already in effect at all levels. In Armenia, Soros’s projects have not yet reached the final stage of implementation, at which one can state a complete loss of sovereignty. But Ukraine is a vivid example of how Soros NGOs have brought the country “to the brink”.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory based on recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about George Soros.

Ukraine is a sovereign and independent state with a democratically-elected President and parliament. You can find here numerous disinformation cases on Ukraine being under foreign control.

Disinfo: Biden will have no legitimacy because frauds were massive in US presidential elections

Donald Trump did not accept the transition. He agreed to pay the transition funds but he did not give up contesting. And he is right to contest the election since massive fraud took place.

A president who claims to rule the country on the basis of massive fraud is a president who has no legitimacy. A lot of people in the United States will continue to challenge the legitimacy of a hypothetical Biden administration. If Donald Trump accepted this it is for a very clear reason that he announces in his press release: Emily Murphy who is in charge of this has suffered threats, multiple threats. So he [Trump] preferred that the threats stop. When you threaten someone in an administration, you behave in an unworthy manner. And it wasn’t just there that there were threats. There is a very murky situation right now in the United States and it’s part of this very murky situation.

Disproof

Disinformation about the US in the context of the US presidential election.

In its interim assessment on the conduct of the election, the OSCE finds that the contest was "competitive and well managed" (p. 1), noting that "evidence-deficient claims about election fraud" (ibid.) have been refuted by "election officials at all levels" (p. 3) and "national security agencies" (p. 11).