Disinfo: OPCW confirmed the absence of a toxic substance in Navalny’s samples


[The creator of Novichok chemical agent] Leonid Rink, in his interview to Dmitry Kiselyov confirmed that OPCW did not find in Navalny’s body traces of a toxic substance. The main evidence is that no phosphorus fragment was identified in Navalny’s samples. Basically, OPCW found traces of something unknown. The fragment that was identified could even refer to a detergent.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.

OPCW's report has been misrepresented. OPCW does not directly name Novichok in its conclusions published on the website on 6 October. However, point 5 of the summary mentions that biomarkers found in Navalny's samples "have similar structural characteristics to the toxic chemicals belonging to schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15".

The chemicals in question have been added to the Chemicals Weapons Convention based on the results of the Skripal poisoning investigation. Both these chemicals are prohibited toxic substances from Novichok group, which means that the OPCW found traces of a known prohibited agent in Navalny's samples, which is definitely not a 'detergent'.

As stated by OPCW's Director-General, H.E. Mr Fernando Arias, "these results constitute a matter of grave concern". The UK Delegation to OPCW has also tweeted that ‘OPCW technical analysis confirms that traces of nerve agent from Novichok group were found in bio samples’. Read further debunking by the Insider here.



  • Reported in: Issue 215
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 09/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: novichok, OPCW, Alexei Navalny, Dmitry Kiselyov


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The protests in Kyrgyzstan are an attempt to carry out a “colour revolution” by external forces

The protests in Bishkek are an attempt by external forces to carry out a “color revolution” in Kyrgyzstan. Parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan were transparent. There are no grounds for mass protests in the country. What is happening in Bishkek is an example of the interference of external forces in the democratic processes in the countries neighboring Russia.


Conspiracy theory. The claim that external actors are stirring up protests in Russia's neighborhood is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative.

Thousands rallied in Kyrgyzstan to protest against the results of a parliamentary election that large parts of the society perceive as rigged. According to the media reports, the representatives of the election observation mission of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), said that although the vote had been "generally well organised", allegations of vote buying were a "serious concern".

The OPCW has proven that it is a deceitful organisation

The OPCW has proven that it is a completely deceitful organisation; especially its technical council and Britain, which do not want to answer what happened in the Syrian case of Douma.

The West is so audacious with its impunity that it launched a missile attack on Syria on the basis of photos brought to Donald Trump, showing the atrocities of the Syrian regime. They tried to convince that the source to be believed is the White Helmets, an absolute project of Western special services.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria and missile strike by the United States and the coalition on Syria.

The OPCW is an independent inter-governmental organisation. In March 2019, the OPCW confirmed in its final report that chlorine was used in the attack on Douma on 7 April 2018. Allegations in the pro-Kremlin media of "staged" chemical attacks are a part of the ongoing campaign by Syria and Russia to smear the White Helmets as terrorists and war criminals. However, available evidence has yet to link a single chemical attack to any other party than the Syrian regime.

The task of Navalny project is to cause maximum harm to Russia

The task is to set Russia and its neighbours on fire. The task is to cause maximum damage to the country. This is what the Navalny project was created for. This is what the Navalny project was funded for by his Western curators.


A conspiracy theory presented without evidence. It is consistent with the Kremlin propaganda narrative that the poisoning of the Russian opposition leader is designed to help the West attack Russia.

Aleksey Navalny, and other people opposing the government of Vladimir Putin, do not aim to undermine Russia as a country. Navalny has organised demonstrations promoting reform while exposing and attacking endemic political corruption by the leadership of the Russian Federation. Navalny has run for political office on the same platform.

The claim that Navalny receives “grants” for his political engagement continues the Kremlin disinformation narrative whereby any Russian opposition party, politician or even protestors are “puppets of the West” (see similar cases here and here).

Previously we have seen other similar narratives such as the West has an interest in the death of Navalny to launch a new wave of sanctions against Russia and West will falsely accuse Russia of poisoning Navalny, as with Skripal and Litvinenko.