Disinfo: OPCW violated Chemical Weapons Convention to serve Western interests

Summary

The OPCW reputation as an authoritative expert body in the field of chemical disarmament has actually been sacrificed to the Middle East geopolitical ambitions of a small group of countries.

The Investigation and Identification Team (IIT) was set up in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention. Only the UN Security Council has the right to apportion blame for chemical attacks.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative attacking the independence and integrity of the OPCW, and absolving the Syrian regime of responsibility for chemical attacks.

The claim that a "small group of countries" calls the shots in the OPCW is false. The ITT was established following the Fourth Special Session of the Conference of the States Parties, during which it was decided to "put in place arrangements to identify the perpetrators of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic" (p. 3, para 10). The decision passed with a majority of 82 votes against 24, satisfying the two-thirds minimum which the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) requires for "matters of substance" (Art. VII, para 18). In a November 2019 vote, 106 delegates voted to approve the ITT's funding, against 19 opposed. Moreover, the Team itself "includes personnel from all geographical groups."

The claim that only the UN Security Council can assign responsibility for chemical attacks is untrue and at odds with Russia's own UNSC voting record. The CWC provides that, "in cases of particular gravity," the Conference shall "bring the issue, including relevant information and conclusions, to the attention of the […] Security Council" (Art. XII, para 4, emphasis added." Such cases grant the Security Council the power to "redress a situation and to ensure compliance" with the CWC, but do not imply an exclusive right to apportion blame.

It is true that the UN-OPCW Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM) used to be the only international body authorized to identify the perpetrators of chemical attacks, and its mandate was subject to extension by the UN Security Council. However, the Mechanism was terminated in late 2017, after the Russian delegation repeatedly blocked UNSC resolutions calling for its extension. The IIT has thus been set up to investigate "cases for which [JIM] has not identified the perpetrators of chemical weapons use in Syria."

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 194
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 22/04/2020
  • Language/target audience: English
  • Country: Russia, Syria
  • Keywords: United Nations, OPCW, Chemical weapons/attack, Syrian War, The West
  • Outlet: Sputnik News
see more

The JIT tampered with the MH17 wreckage to hide an internal explosion on board

The Dutch investigators (JIT) manipulated the wreckage of the aircraft, modifying it for the sake of their version of the crash.

For example, one of the main pieces of material evidence is the front pressure bulkhead. As a result of an explosion in the cockpit, it was destroyed in several parts. They were found, brought to the Netherlands and … the torn metal was pulled back again, as if the whole frame was almost not affected by shelling of the Buk missile. The investigation did not want to show breaks.

By the totality of numerous facts, it became apparent that the reason for the MH17 crash was an internal explosion (explosions) on board.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the MH17, aiming to undermine the Joint International Investigation of the crash and subsequent criminal trial.

A special team, known as the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), was established to conduct the criminal investigation of the downing of the Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 in 2014. The team comprises officials from the Dutch Public Prosecution Service and the Dutch police, along with police and criminal justice authorities from Australia, Belgium, Malaysia and Ukraine.

Strange coincidence of epidemics and research laboratories supported by the US in Ukraine

The US embassy in Ukraine officially recognised that they keep toxins and pathogens in Ukraine. Strangely, epidemics started next to those facilities.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about "secret laboratories" in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. See examples of similar disinformation narratives about the Lugar laboratory in Tbilisi, Georgia.

The US supports the research against dangerous infectious diseases through the Biological Threat Reduction Program. The US Embassy in Ukraine reaffirmed that the country offers its support to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.

London doctors classify coronavirus patients based on their “worthiness”

London doctors have explained to the community how they will “classify” coronavirus patients: young patients without comorbidities will be treated in a field hospital. The elderly, who have fewer chances of survival, will be assigned to public hospitals. There, they are asked, first of all, to sign a pledge not to demand resuscitation if their situation becomes worse. But many patients rebelled against this decision. As a result, the doctors adopted a special algorithm, according to which a patient is deemed “worthy” of an ICU bed and respirator or not.

Disproof

A claim provided with no evidence, and a recurrent narrative about the West’s inability to manage the coronavirus crisis–as well as sacrificing its elderly for economic reasons.

In fact, since the start of the crisis, the main focus of the medical and social services of Western states is to assist the older population as it is the main risk group for this disease.