Disinfo: OSCE is against Donald Trump

Summary

Once Trump has announced the fraud, the OSCE said: “We recognise the outcome of elections, you undermine faith in democracy.” So, the OSCE is against Trump.

Disproof

This is part of an ongoing pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign on the US election and an attempt to portray flaws in the democratic system fitting the pro-Kremlin narrative against Western order and democratic values.

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which has been observing US elections since 2002, found the 2020 general election to be "competitive and well managed" despite the logistical issues presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. "Baseless allegations of systematic deficiencies, notably by the incumbent president, including on election night, harm public trust in democratic institutions," the OSCE report says. However, it would be wrong to assume, that OSCE is against Trump based on this statement.

In fact, the second group of international election observers from the Organisation of American States (OAS) reported its members did not see any evidence of fraud despite President Trump’s assertions that widespread fraud affected the election. The OAS’s preliminary report, released last week, was based on 28 experts from 13 countries who witnessed the election proceedings in Washington, D.C., and four states: Georgia, Iowa, Maryland and Michigan. The expansiveness of the observation was inhibited by the COVID-19 pandemic, the organisation noted.

See more disinformation cases on the US presidential elections 2020 and their debunking.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 221
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 06/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: US Presidential Election 2020, Donald Trump, Elections, OSCE

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Germany is a US vassal

What did Trump do wrong to get so much hatred from the German power and media apparatus? Basically, he has deprived them of something very important that a vassal demands from the lord of the castle. To be patted on the shoulder now and then.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about German-American relations. Pro-Kremlin outlets often use the disinforming narrative about different countries being under the American thumb - see other examples here.

Germany is an independent and sovereign country and is not dependent on the United States of America in terms of foreign policymaking and therefore it is a conspiracy theory presented without any evidence. Germany and the US have close partner relations of two sovereign and independent countries.

Deep State with Victoria Nuland was the driving force behind regime overthrow in Ukraine

More practical substance for the world outside the USA might be the question, who will be the foreign policy and security adviser in the new administration. The direct intersections with the “deep state”, oh pardon, that is, of course, an invention of malicious tongues. Let’s say the oligarchy, the corporations and the networks of influence.

But if the “Deep State” existed, the already mentioned Victoria Nuland would be a deep state person, like in a storybook […] Ms. Nuland was in fact the driving force behind the regime overthrow in Ukraine rather than her head of state, Obama. Her personal imprint was more prominent.

Disproof

The claim that Ms. Nuland is one of the organisers of Euromaidan in 2014 in Ukraine is a part of a recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that claims that protests were organised by foreign forces.

In this case, the narrative with Ms. Nuland is adapted to the "Deep State" theory, which states that there won’t be any change in US foreign policy whoever wins the US election. This claim matches a well-established pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about global elites secretly ruling the world, and specifically a so-called "Deep State" in the United States. This narrative aims to question the legitimacy of democracy and Western institutions in general.

NATO curators control the remnants of the Ukrainian “fleet” and naval saboteurs

NATO curators control the remnants of the Ukrainian “fleet” and naval saboteurs. Ukraine’s army is prepared and used by the forces of the NATO military bloc.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation on Ukraine, the aggressive West, NATO encircling Russia and NATO belligerence. This is consistent with the narratives challenging Ukrainian statehood and painting the US and NATO as the puppet-masters of Ukrainian politics.

Ukraine is a sovereign state. Neither the US nor NATO controls Ukraine. Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity continue to be violated by acts of aggression by the Russian armed forces since February 2014. Despite NATO having refuted such claims many times, pro-Kremlin propaganda systematically states that NATO planned to create military bases on the territory of Ukraine: in Crimea, Donbas, the Sea of Azov. A bilateral treaty between Russia and Ukraine, signed in 2003 and ratified by Russia in 2004, governs the use of the Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov, which in the treaty are considered to be the “internal waters” of both Russia and Ukraine. A treaty stipulates that agreement from each of the two littoral countries is required for warships from any other country to enter the internal sea.