We know perfectly well who is behind all the events in Bolivia, who has sought the resignation of Morales – the United States. They have long sought his resignation because naturally, Americans don’t like the left in Latin America.
Conspiracy theory; no evidence given. This narrative falls within the broader pro-Kremlin disinformation efforts attempting to deny the existence of genuine grass-roots protests, portraying them as foreign-led efforts and fake colour revolutions.
This is also part of a disinformation narrative about US-led regime change operations against left-wing governments in Latin America. You can see other examples of this narrative in the EUvsdisinfo database, such as the alleged presence of a US marine in the Venezuelan barricades and the promotion of a Ukraine-style 'colour revolution', the training of Venezuelan exiles in Guyana for military operations inside the country, preparations for a military intervention after forcing Brazil to join NATO, deliberate blackouts in South America caused by the US, or the existence of plans for the secession of oil-rich regions in both Venezuela and Mexico.
Although the United States "applauds the Bolivian people for demanding freedom", there is no evidence to suggest that the US was directly involved in Evo Morales' resignation.
Morales’ resignation came during mass protests in the country after the Organisation of American States (OAS) reported “extensive irregularities” in the election for his fourth term. Morales had invited the OAS to observe the vote, and the group called for the election to be annulled. Read the full debunk by Polygraph.
Read the statement from the EU's High Representative/Vice President Federica Mogherini on the situation in Bolivia here.
For further cases on the situation in Bolivia, see here.
As soon as the parliament ratifies the Istanbul Convention, children in our schools and pre-schools will be forced to decide themselves if they are a boy or a girl.
Today, under the guise of protecting women from domestic violence, they are trying to impose on us a document that can negatively affect the younger generation, deprive it of moral guidelines, respect for the national and family values. We can’t allow Satanists and transvestites to impose their own rules and false values on us.
Recurring disinformation narrative on the Istanbul Convention. This message is consistent with pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the morally corrupt West and threatened traditional values.
The Istanbul Convention (the Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence) is a treaty of the Council of Europe that opens the path for creating a legal framework at the pan-European level to protect women against all forms of violence, and prevent, prosecute and eliminate violence against women and domestic violence.
Soros has become a headache for the Nikol [Nikol Pashinyan, the Prime minister of Armenia]. Transnational globalist organisations keep heavily pressuring him, demanding practical steps of national defilement. Also, importing LGBTs from abroad is part of the anti-Armenian program. It is planned to “import” up to 30,000 of these “creatures”.
Conspiracy theory. This message is consistent with recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the morally corrupt West and threatened traditional values as well as the West as a threat and promoter of perversion. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives portraying philanthropist George Soros as a menace bent on destroying countries. See here for more cases. Read similar cases claiming that Armenia is under Soros' occupation, and that foundation is organising clashes in Armenia.
The claim that 30,000 LGBT people are going to enter Armenia is unfounded. This message is in line with other claims, that influx of 50 000 perverts is expected from abroad, that Istanbul convention is a threat for Armenian traditional family and to the Armenian Army.
Following the return of Crimea to Russia in 2014, the European Union imposed economic sanctions on Russia, which run until 31 January 2020.
This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the illegal annexation of Crimea.
Crimea did not "return" to Russia but was illegally annexed by Moscow. On 27 March 2014, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution in which it stated that the referendum in Crimea was not valid and could not serve as a basis for any change in the status of the peninsula. On 17 December 2018, the UN General Assembly confirmed its non-recognition of the illegal annexation of Crimea.
