Performers of the “Orange Revolution” in Belarus have failed. An attempt was made to implement a pre-designed programme against Belarus, which in such cases, be it Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine or the Arab countries, is immediately launched. The programmes are the same, in some cases they have peculiarities, unique developments conditioned by them. Nowadays, the technologies of the” orange revolution “are also developing. In Belarus, for example, there was no prominent opposition leader, but instead there were various directions of mass demonstrations directed from abroad, which was a novelty in the case of Belarus.
This is part of an ongoing Russian disinformation campaign on Belarus based on recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, such as accusing other countries of interference and portraying popular protests against electoral fraud in the country as a Western-led colour revolution.
There is no evidence that the West is trying to destabilise the situation or create a coup in Belarus.
There was no "Orange revolution" in Belarus. Protests in the country erupted to contest the results of the presidential elections in Belarus that took place on the 9 August, which are considered fraudulent by a large part of Belarusian society. The European Union has also stated that the elections were neither free nor fair.
Pro-Kremlin media frequently use disinformation narratives about popular protests around the world allegedly incited and funded by the US and other Western states. It has been applied, among others, to protests in Ukraine, Venezuela, Georgia, Armenia and Belarus, as well as to present a deceiving narrative on the aggressive West constantly preparing new coups.
Read similar disinformation cases: The Baltic States and Poland are blowing Belarus up from the inside, Ukrainian militants are staying in Belarus to carry out a coup d'etat, in Belarus, there are signs of a colour revolution, but a hybrid one, that the protests in Belarus are a colour revolution conducted according to a Maidan scenario.
The Kremlin has repeatedly denied allegations that security services used the Novichok military poison.
The Russian side has repeatedly expressed its willingness to cooperate since it appealed to the competent authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany with a request to present the revealed facts of poisoning. It was quite expected that Russia’s requests would not be satisfied, since their presence would have put a glorious end to the joint venture of the Western special services.
Conspiracy theory. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexei Navalny alleging that he was sponsored by anti-Russian forces.
There are no grounds for connecting either the US or UK or any Western special services to Navalny's poisoning. The activist fell ill on a 20 August flight from Siberia to Moscow. Initially hospitalized in Omsk, he was transferred to the Charité hospital in Berlin at the request of his family. Clinical findings at the Charité hospital indicated that Navalny was poisoned with a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors. Subsequent toxicological tests provided unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny.
Any laboratory in the world is able to produce this substance [Novichok] as Vil Mirzayanov has revealed in his book all the needed formulas to produce this toxic agent.
Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the poisoning of Alexey Navalny.
The use of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group in the poisoning of Alexei Navalny was established beyond any doubt by a Bundeswehr laboratory.
Kyiv decided to support Azerbaijan in military operations in Nagorno-Karabakh. Armament will go under the guise of humanitarian aid in the near future. It will be delivered to Azerbaijan by the military transport aircraft of Ukraine.
This is a pro-Kremlin narrative about Nagorno-Karabakh.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine has denied all similar statements that Ukraine is allegedly ready to get involved in the war in Nagorno-Karabakh. Also, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine stressed that the decision to provide assistance to another state is made by the president and the government. However, the Foreign Ministry stressed that Ukraine remains committed to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.
