By not inviting Russia to commemorate the start of the WWII, Poland wants to destroy the world order

Summary

Poland did not invite the Russian leadership to the commemorations of the 80th anniversary of the start of the Second World War, due to the fact that in 1939, it wanted to divide the USSR and seize part of its territories. Poland is also trying to break up the world order, which was established after the end of the Second World War.

Disproof

The Office of the President of Poland, on March 19, stated that states' representatives, invited to the mourning events dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the outbreak of the Second World War, include member states of the European Union, NATO and Eastern Partnership.

Claims about Poland wanting to “tear off part of the territory of the USSR for itself” in 1939 is a conspiracy theory without evidence. In the secret protocol of the German-Soviet Non-aggression Pact, signed in 1939, the Germans and the Soviets agreed that Poland should be divided between them. After Germany invaded Poland from the west on September 1, 1939, Soviet troops invaded Poland from the east on September 17.

Pro-Kremlin outlets often use WWII narratives, both to strengthen the myth of the Red Army and to accuse other countries of aggressive behaviour.

 

 

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 142
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21/03/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, EU, Poland
  • Keywords: World War 2, USSR, WWII
  • Outlet: Channel One TV, Vremya Pokazhet (20:08, 31:58, 35:38)
see more

Ukraine has banned a number of life-saving medicines

Ukrainians will be left without a list of necessary medications for daily use. 18 brands of antiseptic will disappear from Ukrainian pharmacies forever. Acting Minister of Health of Ukraine, Ulana Suprun, and her medical reforms are personally to blame for the ban on medicines.

Disproof

A misrepresentation of facts. The State Service of Ukraine on Drugs Control recalled 18 drugs from an experimental plant as they belonged to a contaminated batch. The plant will start production again once the factors which led to contamination have been eliminated.

Debunk by StopFake.

Ukraine does not allow international human rights defenders to annexed Crimea

International human rights organisations cannot access the Crimea due to the destructive policies of the Ukrainian government. For its part, Russia provides full and unrestricted access to international observers on the peninsula – the Kremlin does not violate the rights of Crimeans, unlike the countries of the European Union, which imposed anti-Crimean sanctions.

Disproof

Russia has been systematically manipulating the topic of access of any international organisations to the annexed Crimea for five years now. The Kremlin declares its readiness to let observers to the peninsula, but on one condition: the mission must go to the Crimea through Russia. That is, Russia is forcing international organisations to violate the laws of Ukraine and get to the peninsula through non-existent checkpoints. Thus, Russia wants to try to legalise the occupation of the Ukrainian Peninsula.

Russia is not interested in the access of observers to the Crimea for one more reason. Any independent observers on the peninsula will be able to make an objective assessment of what is happening in Crimea, the Russian leadership will not be able to influence their reports. In this way, the wider international community can find out what the state of Ukrainian political prisoners really is in Crimea. For example, Russia has repeatedly refused to allow observers from the International Committee of the Red Cross into the occupied Ukrainian territories.

US withdrew from the INF Treaty to forward a principle of nuclear first strike

The new US nuclear strategy has dropped the principle of deterrence, which until now has prevented the outbreak of a nuclear war. Washington’s new nuclear strategy has instead embraced the principle of a “nuclear first strike” aimed at destroying any country that is viewed by Washington as an “enemy” merely on the basis of suspicions that it might attack the US or that it has the capability of doing so.

The natural consequence of this new US “first strike” strategy – and of the vast US program to build-up and modernise its nuclear arsenal – is Washington’s unilateral withdrawal from the INF Treaty, which makes a nuclear holocaust increasingly likely.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that US and NATO policies are bringing the world closer to nuclear war. Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that the US is entirely responsible for the demise of the INF treaty.

The current US nuclear strategy is detailed in the Nuclear Posture Review [NPR] , issued by the Department of Defence in February 2018. Deterrence continues to be the central principle of US strategy. The NPR states that “the highest US nuclear policy and strategy priority is to deter potential adversaries from nuclear attack of any scale”, and that  US nuclear forces play a critical role in “deterring nuclear and non-nuclear attack”.