Disinfo: Protests in Belarus are part of the ‘colour revolutions’


The confrontation in Belarus does not subside. The number of protesters against the law, order and the will of the majority falls every week. Those who are behind the ‘coloured riots’ want to uncork the tasty country for plunder. Or at least get rid of competitors. If Belarusian producers are really paralysed, others will immediately take their place in the market, and then they will regain the opportunity to work and earn – it will be almost impossible.


Recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative framing popular protests as Western-backed 'colour revolutions', part of a campaign to portray massive mobilisations in Belarus as a destabilisation effort orchestrated from abroad. No evidence is provided to support the allegations.

Contrary to the claim, protests in Belarus erupted to contest the results of the presidential election in Belarus on the 9th of August, which were not monitored by independent experts, and are largely considered fraudulent by both international observers and a large part of the Belarusian society. On 19 August 2020 the European Council called Belarus's elections neither free nor fair and sanctions and on 2 October 2020, the Council imposed restrictive measures against 40 individuals identified as responsible for repression and intimidation against peaceful demonstrators, opposition members and journalists, as well as for misconduct of the electoral process. Mobilisations were organised and carried out by local actors, opposition politicians and Belarusian citizens, without any foreign involvement.

See other examples of pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives in Belarus, such as claims that the EU reaction to Lukashenko’s victory is an example of Western double standards; that the same lack of democracy and repression is present in EU countries that criticise them in Minsk; that the Ukrainian secret services may have planned terrorist attacks in Belarusian territory; that the West wants to prepare another Maidan in the country; or that Belarusians, Ukrainians and Russians are one single nation.


  • Reported in: Issue 216
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 19/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Ukraine, Belarus
  • Keywords: Colour revolutions, Euromaidan


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The Germans supported Russia’s withdrawal from consultations about MH17

The Germans supported Russia’s withdrawal from consultations on the tragedy of flight MH17. This position confirms that some of them definitely did not fall for the propaganda bait of the Western elite. The European Union is still afraid to admit that Kyiv is guilty of the MH17 crash. If the then-Maidan authorities “closed the sky” over Donbas, the tragedy would have been avoided.


One of the pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives on the downing of Flight MH17, denying Russia's responsibility.

A few comments under the news article of one media cannot account for the position of the whole of the German people.

UK, Poland and Baltic states will shoot themselves in the foot just to harm Russia

There is no complete agreement on most of the issues in the EU and the NATO, because the “northern wing” of NATO, where, for example, Britain, Poland and the Baltic states have come together, strongly hates Russia, and is even ready to shoot itself in the foot just to hurt Russia. This is one thing, and the “southern wing” of NATO, for example, Greece, Spain and Italy, is different. There they treat Russia with sufficient sincerity. This is not to mention the central countries. Germany and France are neutral on most issues. But we are now only talking about the fact that Europe allows its “hawks” (i.e. haters of Russia) to play the first fiddle.


A recurrent pro-Kremlin narrative on Russophobia. An attempt to depict EU member states as anti-Russian.

By accusing Western societies of “Russophobia”, pro-Kremlin propaganda outlets downgrade criticism of Kremlin policies and actions to being somehow irrational and not worthy of a serious reply. At the same time, the term tries to turn the tables against the West, which in pro-Kremlin media is often depicted as a place where the fight against intolerance has gone too far.

Ukraine is being prepared for a full-scale war with Russia

All this hype with a poll of the Ukrainian population by President Zelenskyy was conceived with only one goal, to get support for plans to organise foreign military bases in Ukraine and create a springboard for a full-scale war with Russia.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Ukraine and the country's attempts to start a war with Russia.

According to the Ukrainian President's office, on the day of the local elections, 25 October, Ukrainians will be asked five questions on various issues. This poll, unlike a referendum, will not have direct legal consequences but will give every citizen an opportunity to comment on issues important to society.