Disinfo: Russia destroyed stockpiles of novichok according to OPCW rules

Summary

The entire Novichok stockpile in Russia was destroyed in accordance with the protocols of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), and this was done in an official way.

Therefore, to say that there is either production or old stock of agents from chemical warfare in Russia is of course false information.

Disproof

In September 2017, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed the full destruction of the 39,967 metric tons of chemical weapons possessed by Russia, but Novichoks were never declared to the OPCW and weren’t included in the Chemical Weapons Convention until 2019.

This is part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign on the poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny after the use of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group was established beyond any doubt by a specialist Bundeswehr laboratory.

The use of multiple and simultaneous versions about an event involving questionable actions by the Russian government or its allies, in order to confound citizens about the actual truth, is a recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation strategy, already seen in the cases of the MH17 downing, the illegal annexation of Crimea, the murder attempt against Sergei and Yulia Skripal or chemical attacks in Syria.

See other examples of pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives on Alexei Navalny’s poisoning in our database, such as claims that only caffeine and alcohol were found in his blood, that the US wanted to use it to block Nord Stream 2 and Russia’s vaccine against coronavirus, that the West hopes that he dies to have an excuse for new sanctions, or that Western accusations about Navalny’s case are as false as they were about Sergei Skripal and Alexander Litvinenko.

publication/media

View more
  • Reported in: Issue 212
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 15/09/2020
  • Language/target audience: Arabic
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: novichok, OPCW, Chemical weapons/attack, Alexei Navalny, USSR

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

No evidence of Navalny poisoning, West wants to stop Nord Stream 2

No evidence (of the poisoning of opposition Russian politician Alexei Navalny) was provided. Why is Germany involved? Because of Nord Stream 2. In order to stop this gas pipe line, it is necessary to drag Germany into a dubious showdown with Russia.

Disproof

Allegations about the poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, which are not supported by any evidence. The poisoning of Navalny has nothing to do with the "intention" of Western countries to impose additional sanctions against Russia in order to stop the construction of Nord Stream 2.

A prominent Russian opposition figure Alexey Navalny fell ill during a flight and the plane had to make an emergency landing in Omsk. Doctors there said he was in a coma and they were trying to save his life. Since then he has been transferred to Berlin and is receiving treatment at Berlin's Charité Hospital. The German Federal government said that toxicological tests provided  “unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group” in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny.

If the Kremlin interferes in Belarus, Ukraine attacks the Donbas

Western “mentors” told Kyiv that if Moscow starts becoming politically active in Belarus, Ukraine would have to launch a strong strike against the Donbas.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Russian disinformation narrative claiming that the West is involved in the events in Belarus. In this particular case, this narrative is interwoven with another regular pro-Kremlin claim about Ukraine being a puppet of the West.

The protests in Belarus erupted to contest the results of the presidential election on the 9th of August, which are considered fraudulent by a large part of Belarusian society. The European Union has also stated that the elections were neither free nor fair.

The West carries out a colour revolution in Belarus and tears away Minsk from Moscow

The West is trying to arrange a new “adventure” in Belarus. The US and the EU want to “tear away” Minsk from Moscow, using the so-called “Ukrainian strategy”, as well as the instruments used during “colour revolutions”.

Disproof

This is part of an ongoing pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign on Belarus based on recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, such as accusing other countries of interference and portraying popular protests against electoral fraud in the country as a Western-led colour revolution.

The protests in Belarus erupted to contest the results of the presidential elections in Belarus that took place on the 9 August, which are considered fraudulent by a large part of Belarusian society. The European Union has also stated that the elections were neither free nor fair. There is no evidence that the protests in Belarus are funded and organised externally.