Disinfo: Russia shut down its chemical weapons programmes decades ago and has destroyed its stockpiles of chemical weapons

Summary

Russia ceased producing chemical weapons in 1992 and has destroyed its stockpile of chemical weapons.

Disproof

Recurrent pro-Kremlin narrative that Russia shut down all its chemical weapons programmes decades ago and that it had nothing to do with the poisoning and attempted murder of former Russian spy Skripal in Salisbury. See previous cases here. The first claim about chemical weapons has been refuted by the UK government’s investigation into the Salisbury attack. The UK government's assessment of the attack is fully supported by leading Western states. This investigation found that Sergey and Yuliya Skripal were poisoned using a specific Novichok nerve agent. This was confirmed by an independent OPCW [Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons] analysis. Novichok nerve agents were developed by the Soviet Union in the 1980s under a programme codenamed FOLIANT. According to the UK intelligence assessment, based on open-source analysis and intelligence information, over the past decade, Russia has produced and stockpiled small quantities of Novichok agents, long after it signed the Chemical Weapons Convention. On 6 September, the UK, the US, France, Germany and Canada issued a joint statement, saying they had “full confidence” in the UK’s assessment that the Salisbury attack used Novichok nerve agents, and that it has been carried out by Russia’s GRU agency and “almost certainly approved at a senior government level”. Further background can be seen here, here and here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 139
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/03/2019
  • Outlet language(s) Italian
  • Country: UK, Russia
  • Keywords: novichok, Sergei Skripal, Provocation, Chemical weapons/attack
see more

The US military has transferred about 50 tons of gold from Syria

The US military transported about 50 tons of stolen gold from Syria. The US military received the gold from terrorists who had hidden the loot near the village of Al-Baghuz.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the US support for terrorists presented entirely without evidence. The source quoted in this article is SANA, an official organ of the Syrian government which promotes the idea of cooperation between the US and Jihadist forces. Read a similar story here.

The West does not want a strong Russia

America and Europe do not want a strong Russia. They are using Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko against Russia. They need a Poroshenko who always screams: Russia is dangerous, we are at war with Russia. If it is the will of the Western world, then Poroshenko should win again.

Disproof

No evidence given. Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on Western belligerence towards Russia and conspiracy theory about the West using Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in order to destabilise Russia.For instance, NATO as the Western organisation created unique cooperation bodies – the Permanent Joint Council and the NATO-Russia Council – to embody its relationship with Russia. It has invited Russia to cooperate on missile defence, an invitation extended to no other partner. The Warsaw Summit Communique 2016 describes NATO's official policy towards Russia: "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia. But we cannot and will not compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe and North America rest".There were democratic Presidential elections held on 25 May 2014 in Ukraine. The Ukrainian people, but not the West, have elected the President Poroshenko. The OSCE characterised the elections as showing the "clear resolve of the authorities to hold what was a genuine election largely in line with international commitments and with a respect for fundamental freedoms". According to the OSCE, the only areas where serious restrictions were reported were those controlled by separatists, who undertook "increasing attempts to derail the process." This fact was reconfirmed by the parliamentary elections of 26 October 2014. The OSCE characterised the vote as "an amply contested election that offered votes real choice, and a general respect for fundamental freedoms".

US and Ukrainian authorities conduct a war in Ukraine

A war against the Ukrainian people is conducted by the US and fascist Ukraine’s authorities. The ongoing presidential campaign is entirely controlled and managed by the United States. After the election, this war will continue and will result in Ukraine’s complete economic, social and demographic collapse. Ukrainian law-enforcement agencies have turned into armed, corrupt and terrorist structures.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about fascists ruling Ukraine and the war in Ukraine. It was Russia who annexed Crimea and provoked a war in Dombas, not the US.