Disinfo: Sanctions against China and Russia are illegitimate

Summary

The sanctions some states levy on Russia and China are illegitimate; these often breach the norms of multilateral international trade laws.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative labelling nearly all Western sanctions as illegitimate.

EU sanctions are legitimate restrictions imposed in accordance with international and European law as a response to violations of international legalities, such as Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, Russia’s use of chemical weapons in an assassination attempt against opposition leader Alexei Navalny, his unlawful imprisonment, and repression against Russian demonstrators (see formal notice), or China’s large scale arbitrary detentions of Uyghurs (see formal notice).

Through restrictive measures, the EU intervenes where appropriate to respond to emerging or current crises. EU sanctions are carefully targeted and designed to be proportionate to the objectives they seek to achieve. Moscow has falsely claimed that the EU sanctions are illegal ever since their imposition in 2014, following Russia's invasion, annexation, and ongoing occupation of Crimea.

See similar cases claiming that the EU adopts sanctions against Belarus to manage its own internal contradictions, that Western sanctions are illegal and hostile actions, and that EU sanctions on Russia are absurd.

Go to search

publication/media

oroszhirek.hu (Archived)
  • Reported in: Issue 267
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30/11/2021
  • Article language(s) Hungarian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Russia, China
  • Keywords: West, Sanctions
see more

Disinfo: Russia is not a threat to Ukraine and is not involved in the war in Ukraine

The official representatives of Ukraine and NATO are constantly using anti-Russian rhetoric and misrepresenting Russia as a threat to Ukraine. Kyiv and the West accuse Russia of direct involvement in the war in Ukraine without presenting any evidence. After the coup in Ukraine in 2014, the new Ukrainian government has hypocritically claimed it does not want a war with Russia, while simultaneously pursuing membership in NATO.

Nov 29, 2021
Disproof

A mixture of recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the war in Ukraine, falsely portraying Ukraine and the West as aggressors and Russia as a benign actor.

The on-going buildup of massive Russian military forces along the Ukrainian borders are obviously designed to threaten Kyiv.

Disinfo: Sputnik V will neutralise the Omicron variant without needing a modification

Sputnik V will neutralise the latest Omicron COVID variant and has started the necessary studies. In the unlikely case that a modification of the vaccine is required, the new version of Sputnik Omicron can be ready for long scale production in 45 days.

Nov 29, 2021
Disproof

This disinformation story was published on 29 November, only 5 days after the Omicron variant was first detected and reported in South Africa on 24 November 2021. Although a number of laboratory studies on this variant are already underway around the globe, even scientists with early access to it, such as South African virologist teams at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg or developers of anti-Covid vaccines such as BioNTech, can’t expect to have reliable data sooner than in two weeks. Therefore, the affirmations made in these articles are unverifiable at this point and can only be considered as part of the pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that has surrounded the Sputnik V since the beginning. See also our reports detailing the use of disinformation and COVID-19 here.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives in our database, such as claims that G20 countries recognised Sputnik V as the best drug for coronavirus prevention, that Sputnik V is already available for more than half of the world’s population, that the West is waging a targeted campaign against Sputnik V, or that or that EU’s decision not to purchase Sputnik V is questionable since other vaccines may be dangerous.

Disinfo: The West is critical of the Sputnik V vaccine for political and ideological reasons

The hypocrisy of Western Europe is evident in its stance on the Sputnik V vaccine. Politicians from Western Europe acknowledge the high effectiveness of the Russian vaccine in private, but criticise it in public space for political and ideological reasons.

Nov 29, 2021
Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about a conspiracy by the West to prevent the success of the Sputnik V vaccine for political reasons. In general, the notion that Western states are discrediting Sputnik V due to their anti-Russian sentiments is a recurrent disinformation narrative used by the Kremlin in its politicization of COVID-19 vaccines.

EMA started a rolling review of the Sputnik V vaccine on 4 March 2021 by application of R-Pharm Germany GmbH. Concerns were initially expressed, including by Russian scientists, regarding Sputnik V’s hasty approval in Russia before phase III clinical trials had begun and before publishing the results from phases I and II. Prior to travelling to Russian production facilities as part of the rolling review in March 2021, the head of the EMA commented that it was her hope that Sputnik V would receive approval and that the agency is “committed to applying the same standards and scrutiny to this review as to any other scientific assessments”. At the beginning of September 2021, EMA stated it was still waiting for necessary additional data from Sputnik V's manufacturers before it can authorise the vaccine.