Schengen visa refusals violate Crimeans’ human rights

Summary

The refusal by a number of EU member states to issue Schengen visas to Crimeans whose passports were issued after 2014 is a violation of human rights. This practice aims to punish the residents of Crimea for their will to self-determination, expressed during the 2014 referendum in which 97 percent of the peninsula’s inhabitants voted to reject the coup in Kyiv and rejoin Russia.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the illegal annexation of Crimea.

Disinformation message appeared after a statement of the head of the European Union’s mission in Moscow, Marcus Ederer.  On July 22, he stressed that the European Union did not recognise and will not recognise the Russian annexation of Crimea, therefore Russian passports issued in Crimea by the Russian authorities after the annexation will not be recognized and accepted when applying for a Schengen visa. Ederer advised residents of the peninsula to visit European countries using their Ukrainian documents.

With the annexation of the Ukrainian Crimea, Russia forcibly imposed the citizenship of the occupying country on two million Crimeans. Crimeans remain citizens of Ukraine, who can obtain a biometric passport and freely take advantage of the visa-free regime with the European Union by visiting a wide list of states without obtaining any additional visas.

The claim that the so-called Crimean referendum was an expression of Crimeans' self-determination is not true. The so-called referendum was organised by a self-proclaimed Crimean leadership lacking democratic legitimacy and installed by armed Russian military personnel following the seizure of public buildings.On March 27, 2014 the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on states, international organizations and specialized agencies not to recognize any change in the status of Crimea or the Black Sea port city of Sevastopol, and to refrain from actions or dealings that might be interpreted as such. In March 2019 on the fifth anniversary of Crimea's annexation, the EU reiterated its position of non-recognition of illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol.

You can read more on the topic here, here and here.

 

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 160
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30/07/2019
  • Language/target audience: English
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine, EU
  • Keywords: Schengen, Human rights, Manipulated elections/referendum, Coup, Russophobia, Euromaidan, Referendum, Crimea
  • Outlet: Sputnik News
see more

No link between fires, floods and global warming

There is no scientifically proven relationship between anomalies in nature, such as fires in some areas and floods in other areas, and global warming […] Everybody is trying to link the situation to global warming, because all anomalies are now linked to rising temperature. However, there is no scientific finding to confirm a relationship between those waves and global warming.

Disproof

Over the recent months, hundreds of wildfires spread across southern Siberia in Eastern Russia, and as of August 1, the fires had burnt about 15,000 square miles, an area larger than the size of Belgium. The area has also witnessed deadly floods which took 25 lives and displaced over 30,000 people this June. 

Although it is common for wildfires to take place in the northern hemisphere between May and October, the locations and intensity of these fires as well as the length of time they have been burning has been described as unprecedented. In June alone, these fires emitted into the atmosphere more carbon dioxide than was released by Arctic fires in the same month between 2010 and 2018 put together.

There are attempts to drag Russia into an arms race

There are attempts to drag Russia into an arms race, just like in the 1980s’, which according to Reagan, undermined the resources of the Soviet Union. However Russia will not play this game.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the INF Treaty.

Russia bears primary responsibility for the end of the INF Treaty, because it has produced, tested and deployed the 9M729 missile, which violates the agreement. In July 2014, the then-US President Obama officially accused Russia of testing a missile in violation of the INF Treaty, which prohibits the US or Russia from possessing, producing or test-flying ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of between 500 and 5500 kilometres.

The US claim that Russia has not complied with the INF treaty was just a pretext to withdraw

The US claim that Russia has not complied with the INF treaty was just a pretext used by Washington to withdraw from the treaty.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative that the collapse of the INF treaty is to be blamed entirely on the US.

It is not true that US claims about Russian non-compliance with the INF treaty were just a pretext to withdraw from the treaty. The US  has been concerned about Russian non-compliance with the treaty for many years. As early as 2008, the US government was aware that Russia was testing a cruise missile in violation of the treaty. In July 2014 the then-US President Obama officially accused Russia of testing the 9M729 missile which violated the INF Treaty. In March 2017, a senior US military official accused Russia of deploying a new missile, which posed a threat to NATO and facilities within the NATO area of responsibility.