Disinfo: Terrorists are blocking a humanitarian corridor established by the Syrian government


Terrorists in the northwestern province of Idlib, in Syria, are preventing citizens from crossing into government-controlled territory through the Abu Al-Duhur checkpoint. According to intelligence data, numerous people want to leave the area, but terrorist groups operating in Idlib are blocking the functioning of the humanitarian corridor established by the Syrian authorities, roads leading to the checkpoint have been also blocked and locals can’t leave under the threat of execution.


No evidence is provided to support the claim. This is a recurrent pro-Kremlin narrative, claiming US support to terrorist groups, preventing civilians from leaving areas under siege to use them as human shields before, as they did in the case of the Rukban refugee camp in southern Syria in February 2019 and again in September of the same year.

According to Associated Press, the Syrian government opened a so-called humanitarian corridor to help civilians to escape from the ongoing fighting, but it remained unused in the first days. Many of the current inhabitants of Idlib are related to opposition groups. According to The Guardian, the corridor “leads to government-controlled areas, and few of those trapped see it as a safe escape route. Returnees with opposition links have faced detention, conscription or worse when arriving in parts of the country ruled by Assad’s forces”.

You can see other examples of pro-Kremlin disinformation on Syria, such as the extent of Bashar Al Assad’s popularity, his human rights record, the international support for Russia’s intervention in the country’s civil war or the alleged Western backing of terrorist groups there.


  • Reported in: Issue 168
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Spanish, Castilian
  • Country: Syria
  • Keywords: Jihad, Syrian War, Terrorism
  • Outlet: Sputnik Mundo
see more

The US promotes ‘balkanisation’ of Mexico to annex rich northern regions

Secessionist plans to ‘balkanise’ Mexico by the [Mexican] opposition National Action Party (PAN) are gaining traction. At the same time, US Republican senator Daniel McCarthy threatens to “annex Mexico”, reviving the ashes of Nueva Vizcaya and the Republic of the Rio Grande in the 19th century. For two decades Mexico’s ‘balkanisation’ has been a strategic issue for the US.


No evidence is provided to support the claim, other than a tweet by a politician of a minoritarian party, who said that the north of the country could be much more developed if it could get rid of the southern poor regions of Chiapas, Oaxaca and Guerrero.

It is true that governors of the states ruled by the National Action Party created an association to oppose the politics of Mexico's president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, but there is nothing pointing to a separatist movement trying to re-establish the entity of Nueva Vizcaya (the first region explored and settled by the Spanish conquerors in the north of the Viceroyalty of New Spain in the 16th century) or the short-lived Republic of the Rio Grande (a secessionist attempt in the 19th century).

Kurt Volker torpedoed Minsk Agreements for financial gain

[Former US Special Representative for Ukraine], Kurt Volker was continuously torpedoing Minsk Agreements, blaming Russia for the aggression, painting Kyiv in favorable light, all for financial gain.



Conspiracy theory based on recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the Minsk Agreements and former US special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker. 

The message aims to obfuscate Russia's responsibility and failure to uphold Minsk Agreements, see similar example: US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt allowed Ukraine "not to comply with the Minsk agreements".

The US and the West are behind Hong Kong protests

Russia agrees with China’s stance on US and Western interventions in Hong Kong. China has compelling evidence that the United States and Western countries are behind the protests and illegal actions in the province of Hong Kong. 


A recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative and conspiracy theory about the Hong Kong protests presented without evidence.

Pro-Kremlin media have long used the narrative about anti-government protests being funded by the US. Examples include colour revolutions in post-Soviet states, the “Arab Spring” revolts, and Ukraine's Euromaidan in 2014. Western non-governmental organisations are often targeted by pro-Kremlin disinformation as agents of this subversive and state-driven influence.