Disinfo: US has pushed Russia to violate the INF Treaty


The US has pushed  Russia to violate the INF Treaty.

By deploying the Aegis missile defence system the US has compelled Moscow to develop  the 9M729 missile system and violate the INF Treaty.

The Aegis missile defence system, deployed by the US  in Eastern Europe, violates the INF Treaty because it could also be used  offensively, to launch cruise missiles. A Pentagon report states that with only minor modifications the Aegis system can be transformed from a defensive into an offensive system.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about missile defence systems.

The Aegis missile defence system (Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defence System) is not in violation of the INF Treaty. The US State Department issued a detailed rebuttal of Russian allegations of US noncompliance with the INF Treaty in 2018. Moreover, in December 2017 NATO affirmed that the US is in full compliance with the INF Treaty, and that Russia possesses a new missile system that aroused “serious concerns”.

In 2014 US President Obama accused Russia of testing an intermediate-range missile land-launched missile in violation of the INF Treaty. Since 2014 the US has repeatedly pressed Russia to return to compliance with its obligations under the Treaty.  According to the US Department of State, Moscow seeks to deflect US and NATO concerns about the 9M729 by accusing the US of being the party in violation of the INF Treaty.

The  “Pentagon report”  quoted in Sputnik article does not  state that “with minor modifications the Aegis system can be transformed from a defensive into an offensive system”. The report deals with ballistic missile defence issues and does not discuss the transformation of defensive into offensive systems.

There is no evidence that Russia developed the 9M729 missile system as a response to the US deployment of the Aegis missile defence system.

Read more here, here and here.






  • Reported in: Issue 134
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 22/01/2019
  • Language/target audience: Italian
  • Country: Russia, US
  • Keywords: Eastern Europe, Missile defence system
  • Outlet: Sputnik Italia
see more

The British government has not provided any proof in the Skripal case

The government of Theresa May has not provided any credible and verifiable proof on the Skripal Case, neither to Russia, nor the public; not even to the EU or Britain’s allies in NATO.



Recurrent pro-Kremlin narrative denying that Russia has anything to do with the poisoning and attempted murder of former Russian GRU officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yuliya in Salisbury. The pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign disseminated over 20 different and often mutually contradictory theories about the attack in Salisbury (more here).

UK police and intelligence investigations have produced hard evidence which is sufficient to charge two Russian nationals for the attack on the Skripals. These two individuals have been established as officers of the Russian Military Intelligence, GRU. More UK public documents/statements on the case here and here.

Tit for Tat: Sweden retaliates with accusations of air space violations after Russian fighter intercepts Swedish spy plane

The Russian Ministry of Defence published a video, demonstrating how a Russian fighter jet intercepts a Swedish spy plane over the Baltic Sea near Kaliningrad. Sweden has answered with accusing, without evidence, Russian military aircraft, of violating its airspace.


Incorrect timeline. Sputnik Estonia and other Russian state media outlets describe the Swedish accusations as a retaliation to the Russian video, published January 24. The Swedish Armed Forces published their report (in Swedish) on Russian air space violations the day before, January 23.

British army nurse was near the Skripals – it’s not a coincidence

There are numerous discrepancies that give reason to doubt the official version of the Skripal Case. It is not a coincidence that the first person who gave first aid to the Skripals was the chief nurse of the British army, Alison McCourt. It is also no coincidence that she was first appointed Chief Nurse of the British Army on February 1. 2018, just a month before the incident with Skripal.


The disinformation message was created as a series of inconsistencies, implying a UK government conspiracy behind the Skripal case. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Salisbury poisoning. For more details, see here.

British Police have presented a solid chain of evidence on the Skripal Case, with pictures, connecting the suspects to the locations in the case. Parts of the material have been released to the public.