Disinfo: The Democratic Party has officially become a fascist party of the US


The fact is that the victorious Democrats at all levels openly promise repressions for everyone who has ever supported Trump.

For several years now, critics of the regime have noted that “the Democratic Party, a bastion of progressive ideas, has officially become a fascist party of the US.”


Disinformation, presented without any evidence, smearing the Democratic Party of the US to portray it as “facist”, consistent with the pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative that the US presidential elections were rigged and casting doubt on the legitimacy of the Biden Administration.

It is not true that the Democrats somehow violated the rules of democracy. President-elect Joe Biden, who was a Democratic Party candidate, won the popular vote by 7 million votes. Although the Trump campaign filed 62 election lawsuits to overturn the result, most have been dismissed. The OSCE Observation Mission stated that the 2020 Presidential election vote was: “competitive and well managed”.

Read more OSCE statements on the American elections here.

On the 6th January 2021, during a debate in the Senate, a number of Trump supporters broke through security perimeters and violently entered the Capitol, the seat of the US parliament, the Congress. The aim of the protesters was to impede the process of formally installing Joe Biden as the President of the United States, despite Biden winning the November election. An overview of the incident can be found here.

See earlier related disinformation claims, alleging that the US enters an era of neo-liberal totalitarianism, that the "Democrats" usurpation of power in the US is a fact, that if Trump surrenders, an era of neo-liberal fascism will start in the USA, that contemporary liberalism is totalitarian and a crime against humanity; that "deep state" won't allow Joe Biden to soften US policy towards China; that Joe Biden was elected thanks to a massive election fraud.


  • Reported in: Issue 227
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 15/01/2021
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: Totalitarianism, Democratic Party (US), Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Nazi/Fascist


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Russia has always upheld the fundamental principles of freedom of expression

The numerous violations of journalists’ rights in the Baltic countries are alarming. On December 3, 2020, the State Security Service of Latvia detained 7 employees of Sputnik Latvia and Baltnews. We regard these aggressive actions as a blatant example of violating the foundations of a democratic society – freedom of the media and freedom of expression.

Russia has consistently and firmly upheld the fundamental principles in the field of freedom of expression, including freedom of the media and free access to information. Meanwhile, the main tendency in the West is to strengthen regulation and to remove the sources of information representing an alternative point of view. the restriction of the rights of journalists is becoming more and more widespread, and individual countries have created real state mechanisms of pressure on “unwanted” media representatives. Russia strongly opposes such practices and insists on strict adherence to the universal principles of freedom of the media.


Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative aimed at portraying Western media as not being independent and biased while Russia is a protector of freedom of speech and the press.

The National Electronic Mass Media Council of Latvia decided in the summer of 2020 to restrict the broadcast of seven channels, belonging to the RT Group. The Latvian authorities view this as a step in accordance with the sanctions regime, introduced by the European Council. The group is headed by Dmitriy Kiselyov, who is subject to restrictive measures, introduced after Russian illegal annexation of Crimea.

Crimea joined Russia in full accordance with international law

Crimea became part of Russia through the democratic choice of its people and in accordance with international law.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the annexation of Crimea claiming that Crimean citizens chose to rejoin Russia through a legal referendum as well as a recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that claims Euromaidan was a coup.

No international body recognises the so-called referendum held on the 16th of March 2014. On the 27th of February 2014, when the so-called referendum was announced, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution which stated that the referendum in Crimea was not valid and could not serve as a basis for any change in the status of the peninsula. A year later Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted that the plan to annex Crimea was ordered weeks before the so-called referendum.

Ukraine, not Russia, is the perpetrator of human rights abuses in Crimea

While expressing concerns over the Crimean Tatars’ fate, Kyiv is basically trying to suffocate Crimea by water blockade of the peninsula.

As an inalienable part of Russia, Crimea fully honours the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. Kyiv’s accusations regarding the situation with ethnic minorities in Russia’s Crimea are unfounded. Over the past six years, Russia has been actively contributing to enhancing social and economic, cultural and religious rights of ethnic minorities living in Crimea. The efforts of Russia’s authorities on strengthening inter-ethnic peace and harmony are evident for any unbiased observer.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative concerning the human rights situation in Crimea.

As the occupying power, Russia has the legal obligation, under the Fourth Geneva Convention, to ensure that the civilian population in Crimea has access to basic necessities such as food, drinking water, and medical services (see Part III, Section III). The Convention's applicability in the case of Crimea has been affirmed by the UN Monitoring Mission in Ukraine.