Disinfo: Destabilisation of Belarus and ousting of Lukashenko was planned in US embassy in Ukraine


A task force was created in the US embassy in Kyiv. Its main goal was to destabilise Belarus and to overthrow Lukashenko. The first grants were given to achieve this. [They were used] in blocking the Belarusian embassy in Kyiv, the adoption of a resolution by the [Verkhovna] Rada on the non-recognition of the election results, and in recalling the Ukrainian ambassador to Belarus.


This is part of an ongoing Russian disinformation campaign on Belarus based on recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, such as accusing other countries of interference and portraying popular protests against electoral fraud in the country as a Western-led colour revolution.

There is no evidence that the US or Ukraine is trying to destabilise the situation in Belarus. US and Ukraine both support the independence and territorial integrity of Belarus and they do not have any political claims.

The protests in Belarus erupted to contest the results of the presidential elections in Belarus that took place on the 9 August, which are considered fraudulent by a large part of Belarusian society. The European Union has also stated that the elections were neither free nor fair. There is no evidence that the protests in Belarus are funded and organised externally.

Pro-Kremlin media frequently use disinformation narratives about popular protests around the world allegedly incited and funded by the US and other Western states. It has been applied, among others, to protests in UkraineVenezuelaGeorgia, and Belarus, as well as to present a deceiving narrative on the aggressive West constantly preparing new coups.

Read similar disinformation cases: The Baltic States and Poland are blowing Belarus up from the inside, Ukrainian militants are staying in Belarus to carry out a coup d'etat, in Belarus, there are signs of a colour revolution, but hybrid one.


  • Reported in: Issue 211
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14/09/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Ukraine, Belarus, US
  • Keywords: Protest, Colour revolutions, Elections


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Europe evacuated its secret agent Navalny; the poisoning is fake

If Germany had any tests, they probably would have shown them already. But most probably, there is nothing at all.

There was no poisoning, only one special operation happened: Europe evacuated its agent Navalny, because obviously he is already unneeded in Russia. He is very weak and cannot attract the attention of anyone except on Twitter. He is not very serious as an opponent. They need a strong character, not him.

The investigation hasn’t found the slightest trace of poison. So if Navalny was really poisoned, it was not done in Russia. Then, it is necessary to “discuss with Germany”.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the Navalny poisoning and the alleged insignificance of the activist.

Anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny has long been the most prominent face of Russian opposition to President Vladimir Putin. His candidacy in the 2018 presidential election was banned by authorities over his conviction by a Russian court of embezzlement, which bars him from running for office. He has been arrested and imprisoned several times during his political career.

Ukraine must continue war in Donbas, otherwise it won’t receive financial support from the West

If the current Ukrainian government ends the war on the frontline in Donbas, then Western countries will no longer give Ukraine money.

The situation on the line of contact in the conflict zone in Donbas, suggests that the current government in Kyiv is interested in continuing the war. It is the condition for another loan from Western states. If there is no war in Donbas, there will be no money.


No evidence given. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the war in Ukraine and Ukraine's relations with its foreign partners.

The claim is made without evidence and is only the latest in a string of pro-Kremlin conspiracy theories alleging that the Ukrainian authorities are purposely leading the country and people toward destruction for short-term financial gain.

If Russia wanted to kill Navalny, it would have chosen anything but Novichok

If the Russian state had tried to murder Alexei Navalny, they would have never allowed his comatose body to be taken by plane to Germany. He would have died in Russian hospitals, where nobody could find “traces of Novichok” in a NATO capital. If Russia was responsible, for sure the last weapon in the world that it would have chosen would be Novichok: in the post-Skripal age, any other method would be preferable.

A butter knife, a gun, a speeding car, a traffic accident… After Skripal, there would be hundreds of preferable and more reliable methods. Navaly is already the third Russian in a row that, allegedly attacked by a deadly “military-grade nervous agent”, mysteriously doesn’t die.


This is part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign on the poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

The use of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group against the Russian dissident has been established beyond any doubt by a specialist Bundeswehr laboratory. The disinformation campaign follows the same playbook that the one deployed after the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daugther in Salisbury in 2018, a case where there is strong evidence of the involvement of Russian intelligence operatives and high-level Russian officials.