Disinfo: The election in the US is an absolute deception – it has no connection to democracy


The US has one of the most archaic election systems in the world with an enormous amount of irregularities. We saw fictitious polling stations, postal voting, all types of fraud, 102%-results. The election in the US is an absolute deception – it has no relation to the majority opinion. This election does not take into consideration the opinions of real people. The word “democracy” is not appropriate there. Thus, the US President is not elected by people.


Pro-Kremlin disinformation about the US Presidential elections and American democracy in general.

The claims that the US Presidential elections faced an “enormous number of irregularities” is not supported by evidence.

The OSCE Observation Mission states that the 2020 Presidential elections vote was “competitive and well managed”. Read more OSCE statements on the American elections here.

See other examples of pro-Kremlin disinformation about the US election in our database, such as claims that Joe Biden is preparing a coup, and his militants are setting the US on fire; that Biden refused to condemn street violence because he fears losing electoral weight; that the US is on the verge of a civil war and militias are only a reaction against governmental abuse; that the CIA is organising a colour revolution to oust Donald Trump after November 2020; or that the result of the election doesn’t matter because the real ruler is the Deep State.

Read more about the American elections and the institution of the electoral college here.


  • Reported in: Issue 219
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 04/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: US Presidential Election 2020, Democracy, Manipulated elections/referendum, Elections, Conspiracy theory


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The elections in Georgia are a legitimisation of a pre-planned scenario by Western partners

Do you remember that the results of any of the [Georgian] elections did not match the results of the “qualified surveys” conducted by our foreign “partners”, “friends” and “other benefactors” before the elections? The difference is always from 1% to 3%.

So why do we [Georgia] hold elections and spend so much money if their [Western partners] “research” is 99% consistent with our “election results”? It can have only one purpose – to legitimise the plan already written by the above-mentioned “partners”.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Western involvement in internal affairs, including elections, as well as grass-roots protests in many states, especially the ones of the former Soviet Union. Parliamentary elections in Georgia were held on October 31, 2020.

The disinformation claim appeared in the pre-election period days before the election day in Georgia, as a prior attempt to frame the election results as a previously planned scenario orchestrated from abroad. No evidence is provided to support the allegations.

Ukraine will legalise mass detentions of Russian citizens

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is initiating amendments to some laws of Ukraine, which will allow the security officials of all departments to detain and place in special zones all citizens of the Russian Federation who crossed the Ukrainian border.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin propaganda narrative about Ukraine's ubiquitous Russophobia.

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine does have a "Draft law on Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Concerning the Regulation of Issues Related to Prisoners of War and Internees in a Special Period". But Russian citizens are not mentioned there. "During a special period, take measures to identify citizens of a state that threatens to attack or carry out aggression against Ukraine on the territory of Ukraine…," the document says.

Russophobia weakened Europe

Europe weakened due to the reigning Russophobia. In 2014, when Western countries started imposing anti-Russian sanctions, experts argued unanimously that the Russian economy wouldn’t resist such a colossal pressure, but these sanctions had more impact in Europe than in Russia. It was the US who dragged the EU into an anti-Russian campaign.


This is a mix of several recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, claiming that sanctions on Russia were Russophobic, that they were imposed following US orders and that they were ultimately ineffective. All of them are false.

Contrary to the claim, the imposition of sanctions on Russia were not the result of “Russophobia”, but a reaction to Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and the deliberate destabilisation of Ukraine. Accusing other countries of “Russophobia” when they call out Russia’s misdeeds is a frequent pro-Kremlin disinformation technique. The EU sovereign decision to impose those restrictions was not due to US dictates but to the fact that Russia’s actions in Crimea and Sevastopol are a violation of international law that remains a challenge to the international security order.