Disinfo: The end of visa-free regime for Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova


It will become more difficult for the citizens of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova to travel to Europe. In practise, the visa-free regime for Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova will end.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation on visa-free regime and ETIAS. euvsdisinfo.eu/report/shocking-news-eu-is-preparing-new-visas-for-serbians-this-is-the-end-of-integrations/,

The European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) is not a visa. A visa free traveller does obviously not need a visa to enter the Schengen area, and ETIAS will not change this. ETIAS will be an automated IT system created to identify any risks associated with a visa-exempt visitor travelling to the Schengen Area. This concerns citizens of all visa free countries, currently over 60 countries including the US and Canada.

ETIAS is expected to be operational as of 2020, pending the adoption in the European Parliament and Council.

Questions and answers: European Travel Information and Authorisation System


Further debunking by the Insider: theins.ru/antifake/101578,


  • Reported in: Issue107
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/05/2018
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia
  • Keywords: EU, Visa liberalisation


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

US bans 155 Ukrainian imports due to political situation

the US suspended duty free import of 155 types of Ukrainian products due to the political situation in the country.


Actually, the decision on the part of the US was made last year and has nothing to do with the current political situation in Ukraine. In December 2017 the US administration put Ukraine on notice for “failing to provide adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights, providing 120 days to remedy the situation and improve the legal regime governing royalties.

As the 120 days’ notice expired and the copyright situation in Ukraine remained unchanged, Ukraine’s partial suspension from the Generalized System of Preferences for 155 types of Ukrainian products went into effect in April 26, 2018. In a special 2018 report on intellectual property rights issued by the Office of the US Trade Representative, Ukraine continues to be on the US priority watch list for copyright infringement together with China, Russia, Argentina and eight other countries.

University of Turin recognizes Donetsk People’s Republic diplomas

The University of Turin recognizes certificates from the universities of the Donetsk People’s Republic


In fact, Turin University’s Department of Economics accepted a student from Makyivka in the occupied Donbas territories for its Master of Economy program. The young woman, born in 1991, had Bachelor and Master degrees diplomas issued by the Donetsk National University well before the Russian occupation of the region in January 2014. The diplomas in question were issued by a Ukrainian university.

Since the occupation of Donetsk, Donetsk State University had moved its campus to central Ukraine and continues to teach students in temporary facilities in the city of Vinnytsia.

Naftogaz loses to Gazprom in EU Court

The Ukrainian company Naftogaz lost a law suit against the Russian company Gazprom in EU court.


Actually, Naftogaz did not file a suit against Gazprom but rather against an October 2016 European Commission decision allowing Gazprom to increase its use of the German Opal gas pipeline. This decision allowed Moscow to expand its Nord Stream pipeline and bypass Ukraine when supplying gas to Europe. Furthermore, the matter never actually became a lawsuit, as the European Court of Justice ruled to “dismiss the action as inadmissible”.

Naftogaz confirms that the issue is not about Naftogaz losing to Gazprom at all, but rather about the Court concluding that the EU decision on the Opal pipeline was not final and was to be implemented on a national level (i.e. in Germany) and was therefore not subject to be challenged in the European court.