The EP allows the destruction of monuments to the fighters against Fascism

Summary

How could the members of the European Parliament sign a resolution, allowing the destruction of memorials, honouring the Soviet soldiers-liberators? The resolution is signed, it is not very surprising. The only way of preserving the memory of the fallen soldiers is to bring all the monuments to Russian territory, to stop the “barbarians” from desecrating the memories of generations.

Reading this opus, one cannot avoid remembering the Anti-Comintern pact that served as the foundation for the Berlin – Rome – Tokyo axis. The signing “democrats” of the European Parlament are, by the way, undeterred by this analogy.

 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the EU and Russophobia.

Contrary to the disinforming articles, the EP resolution acknowledges the context of the presence of monuments, glorifying totalitarian regimes:

The European Parliament

(...)

Notes that the continued existence in public spaces in some Member States of monuments and memorials (parks, squares, streets etc.) glorifying totalitarian regimes, which paves the way for the distortion of historical facts about the consequences of the Second World War and for the propagation of the totalitarian political system;

In a statement, the Press Office of the European Parliament elaborates on the resolution:

MEPs voice concern at the efforts of the current Russian leadership to whitewash crimes committed by the Soviet totalitarian regime and see them as a “dangerous component of the information war waged against democratic Europe”. They also condemn extremist and xenophobic political forces and organisations in Europe for distorting historical facts, and employing the symbolism and rhetoric of totalitarian propaganda, including racism, anti-Semitism and hatred towards sexual and other minorities.

The text of the resolution can be found here.

Comparison between EP resolution and Rome-Berlin-Tokyo axis is unfounded and manipulative. The latter was a political and military agreement between Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan to secure their expansionist interests in the 1930s. See here for more details.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 165
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 23/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, EU
  • Keywords: European Parliament, WWII, Russophobia, Nazi/Fascist
  • Outlet: Sputnik News, Latvia Sputnik News, Uzbekistan
see more

The West has shown its cards: Russia must fall in 2021

The main blow against Russia will be made in 2021, in connection with the parliamentary elections. There are no doubts whatsoever about it. All that is going on is just rehearsals. After all, the parade of the “opposition”, ranging from professional “protestutes” against anything in the world, via seasoned clients of the US Embassy like Navalny and his crowd, to the freak-show of possessed shamans – all this are only the casting. An attempt to select those, who in two years will be transformed into “great thinkers” and, hence, moving the “revolution” forward; a revolution that finally, to the joy of Washington and its allies, will erase the Russian statehood from the face of the earth.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory, presented without evidence. The article is in line with a narrative that protests, in this case in Russia, are always financed by outside forces. Similar cases can be found here.

The article is also consistent with a disinformation narrative about Russophobia and about Western belligerence towards Russia.

‘Cherry’ on sanctions: EU’s fruit exports lose millions due to Russian countersanctions

Russian counter-sanctions affected EU fruit exports. Specialists note that the embargo, which Moscow was forced to impose in response to Western restrictions, led to losses of $170 million from sales of peaches and nectarines, and another $41 million from cherries. According to Russian experts, the European economy was significantly affected by the imposition of sanctions, while Russia received a boost to develop its own agricultural production.

Disproof

Recurring disinformation narrative about Western sanctions against Russia claiming that they produce only positive effects on Russia (similar cases herehere and here).

The report published by USDA GAIN does mention that the EU stone fruit exports declined as a result of the 2014 Russian embargo. However, the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service follows by stating that the loss of the Russian market has been "offset with an increase in exports to the other Member States and to third countries such as Switzerland and Brazil." Same for the EU cherries, whose main destinations are now Belarus, Switzerland and Serbia.

Imperialistic Poland feeds animosities between Ukrainians, Belarusians and Russians

After the collapse of the USSR Poland revitalized the idea of Intermarium project, which foresees the creation of a buffer out of bordering states. Intermarium remains part of Polish domestic and foreign policies and illustrates its imperial ambitions. By attracting Ukrainian and Belarusian migrants, running a propagandistic campaign against Ukrainian and Belarusian governments and Russian world concept, Polish authorities aim to establish anti-Russian Intermarium and to feed animosities between the representatives of the [all-Russian] community.

Polish Giedroyc-Mieroszewski doctrine is still in place and envisages, among other things, weakening Russia by tearing Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, and Caucasian countries away, pulling Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia in the EU and NATO, bringing cheap labour force from Ukraine and Belarus for the benefit of the Polish economy.

Disproof

This is a conspiracy theory and misrepresentation of actual Giedroyc-Mieroszewski doctrine. See here for a similar example. The message contains recurring pro-Kremlin narratives about Poland's imperialistic plans to partition Belarus and Ukraine and to establish the Fourth Republic and to disrupt Belarus-Russia and Ukraine-Russia ties.

The mentioned doctrine was developed in the 1970s by Polish émigrés Jerzy Giedroyc and Juliusz Mieroszewski. The doctrine urged the need to rebuild good relations among Central and Eastern European countries and framed Poland's relations with Ukraine, Lithuania and Belarus as the foundation of its foreign policy. This called for Poland to reject any imperial ambitions and controversial territorial claims, and to accept the post-war border changes. The doctrine supported independence for Belarus and Ukraine. It did not promote the idea to establish a Polish empire at the expense of Poland's eastern neighbours. See here for more information about the Giedroyc-Mieroszewski doctrine.