Disinfo: The first vaccine against COVID-19 available in the Czech Republic will definitely be the Russian one.


Western vaccines are likely to be delayed because they are already lagging behind Russia. The Russian vaccine will arrive in the Czech Republic much earlier. This is the best way to get an effective and safe vaccine as quickly as possible.


The article is part of a pro-Kremlin narrative that promotes the Russian Sputnik V vaccine and other vaccines that Russia is said to have developed. This is part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign on the Russian coronavirus vaccine (opens in a new tab)called “Sputnik V”, which was met with scepticism and criticism, even by Russian specialists.

Russia has announced that it is entering the "Early or Limited Approval" phase without waiting for the results of the third phase of clinical trials. The fact is, however, that the third phase of testing is crucial, because according to experts, it is in the third phase that it can be determined whether the vaccine has more serious side effects that the first two phases of testing may not detect.

Nowhere did the Czech government officials express any interest in the Russian vaccine. Officially, the Government released money to buy 3 million vaccines, to be contracted by the European Union. In order for the Russian vaccine to enter the European market, it would have to be approved by the relevant European authorities, which it is not.

See similar debunked cases how Sputnik V criticism is pure politics, Russian vaccine againgt COVID-19 Sputnik V is ready, or how Russian progress in COVID-19 vaccine has become for the West an outrageous challange.


  • Reported in: Issue 219
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 02/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Czech
  • Country: Czech Republic, Russia
  • Keywords: coronavirus, vaccination


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Ukraine, Poland and Lithuania are an anti-Belarusian ram, they wish make Belarus anti-Russian

The Ukrainian authorities are trying to sit in two chairs. On the one hand, they want to respect their pro-Western commitments including participation the Lublin Trio together with Lithuania and Poland. The Lublin Trio serves as a ram for political transformations in Belarus with the aim of including the latter in the anti-Russian front. On the other hand, Ukraine does not want retaliatory measures from Belarus given that the first round of colour revolution failed. Ukraine’s irrational actions towards Belarus means Ukrainian policies are not made in Kyiv.

Polish strategists, assisted by leading American think tanks like the Rand Corporation, elaborated concepts of hybrid aggression against Belarus. Now that the Belarusian state sustained external aggression, Kyiv risks facing larger security threats from the North than before. Such risks for Kyiv will be higher in case the West transfers the center of anti-Belarusian activities from Poland to Ukraine.


This article promotes recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about Ukraine as a Western puppet, Belarus protests as being organised and controlled from abroad and as the West's attempt to organise a colour revolution. It is also consistent with a pro-Kremlin narrative about the West's attempt to disrupt Belarus-Russia relations.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba announced Ukraine's readiness to line up with the EU sanctions on Belarus. However, there is no evidence that Kyiv was forced by the West to do so, just as the claims about a West-driven colour revolution and aggressive 'Lublin Trio' are groundless. There is no evidence that the US, Lithuania, Poland, or Ukraine somehow staged massive unprecedented protests in Belarus. They began in Minsk on August 9 against the results of the presidential election, and then in other cities. People revolted against election fraud and police violence towards thousands of rally participants.

During January 13th events in Vilnius, Soviet soldiers did not kill any people

In 2016, Lithuania began the trial over January 13th events in Vilnius. Lithuania assumes that people, who died in the clash at that time, were killed by Soviet soldiers.

Russia argues that during the events in Vilnius, Lithuania was part of the Soviet Union and was not an independent state. Respectively, the army carries out official duties according to law. It seeks to ensure public order. Moreover, not one person died due to the actions of Soviet troops.


The case contains historical revisionism and recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the events of January 13th, 1991.

Lithuania restored independence from the USSR in March 1990. Moscow tried to foil the secession with an economic blockade. When that proved ineffective, Soviet troops still garrisoned in the capital Vilnius attacked its TV broadcast tower and sole TV station, killing 14 civilians. The events of the January 13th, 1991, and crimes committed by the USSR troops have been extensively documented. See also BBC reporting from 1991.

Western countries support terrorist organisations because they are politically dependent on the US

All that we are witnessing of Western behaviour indicates that Western countries have engaged with a certain party, giving their support to terrorist organisations. The German logic in describing events is one that testifies to political dependency on the United States, which has clashed with Russia on several fronts in Syria and wanted to strong-arm Russia. However, Moscow has proven its ability to confront in the battlefields. Germany and the Western countries do not cooperate with Russia in the fight against terrorism because they cannot be against the United States in their general political orientation, so therefore all Western countries are escalating against Moscow.


A conspiracy theory supported by no evidence and a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative suggesting that the US and the West more broadly sponsor terrorism. The claim was neither critically challenged nor counterbalanced in the article.

This message is part of a recurrent narrative alleging that the Europe, United States and its NATO partners have established many terrorist organisations and control global terrorism.