DISINFO: The OSCE and the EU are unfair to Russia over the election observation mission
DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS
  • Outlet: cz.sputniknews.com ( archived) *
  • Date of publication: September 20, 2021
  • Article language(s): Czech
  • Countries / regions discussed: Russia, EU, Germany

DISINFO: The OSCE and the EU are unfair to Russia over the election observation mission

SUMMARY

The OSCE's international observation mission during Russia's Duma elections was sufficient. OSCE and the EU are being unfair to Russia and it is a "double standard" because there will be fewer observers during German elections than during the Russian election.

RESPONSE

This is a long-term effort by the Russian Federation to give the impression that Russian elections are fair and legitimate. The article describes compares two international observation missions: the Russian Duma elections and the German Bundestag elections.

The article gives the impression that the division is unfair because Russia has allowed a large number of observers to enter the country ("245 international observers from 59 countries, 10 international organisations and 57 diplomats from diplomatic missions accredited in Moscow"), while in Germany there will be only 4 observers from 3 countries within the OSCE ODIHR.

However, according to an official statement from the OSCE, the number of international observers was very limited by Russia and was by no means sufficient. The EU also stated its concern.

It is true that a much smaller mission is to be sent to Germany, but the fact is that Germany is a long-standing democratic country that is a member of the European Union and has not had cases of election fraud in its democratic past. The Russian Federation, on the other hand, is a country that has long shown signs of rigged elections. Cases of counterfeiting have even been recorded on camera in these last elections.

See similar cases on Russian Duma elections here.

Embed

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.