Disinfo: The protests in Kyrgyzstan are an attempt to carry out a “colour revolution” by external forces


The protests in Bishkek are an attempt by external forces to carry out a “color revolution” in Kyrgyzstan. Parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan were transparent. There are no grounds for mass protests in the country. What is happening in Bishkek is an example of the interference of external forces in the democratic processes in the countries neighboring Russia.


Conspiracy theory. The claim that external actors are stirring up protests in Russia's neighborhood is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative.

Thousands rallied in Kyrgyzstan to protest against the results of a parliamentary election that large parts of the society perceive as rigged. According to the media reports, the representatives of the election observation mission of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), said that although the vote had been "generally well organised", allegations of vote buying were a "serious concern".

See a related disinformation claim alleging that the EU funds protests in Kyrgyzstan in exchange of valuable minerals.


  • Reported in: Issue 215
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Kyrgyzstan, EU
  • Keywords: Colour revolutions


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The OPCW has proven that it is a deceitful organisation

The OPCW has proven that it is a completely deceitful organisation; especially its technical council and Britain, which do not want to answer what happened in the Syrian case of Douma.

The West is so audacious with its impunity that it launched a missile attack on Syria on the basis of photos brought to Donald Trump, showing the atrocities of the Syrian regime. They tried to convince that the source to be believed is the White Helmets, an absolute project of Western special services.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria and missile strike by the United States and the coalition on Syria.

The OPCW is an independent inter-governmental organisation. In March 2019, the OPCW confirmed in its final report that chlorine was used in the attack on Douma on 7 April 2018. Allegations in the pro-Kremlin media of "staged" chemical attacks are a part of the ongoing campaign by Syria and Russia to smear the White Helmets as terrorists and war criminals. However, available evidence has yet to link a single chemical attack to any other party than the Syrian regime.

The task of Navalny project is to cause maximum harm to Russia

The task is to set Russia and its neighbours on fire. The task is to cause maximum damage to the country. This is what the Navalny project was created for. This is what the Navalny project was funded for by his Western curators.


A conspiracy theory presented without evidence. It is consistent with the Kremlin propaganda narrative that the poisoning of the Russian opposition leader is designed to help the West attack Russia.

Aleksey Navalny, and other people opposing the government of Vladimir Putin, do not aim to undermine Russia as a country. Navalny has organised demonstrations promoting reform while exposing and attacking endemic political corruption by the leadership of the Russian Federation. Navalny has run for political office on the same platform.

The claim that Navalny receives “grants” for his political engagement continues the Kremlin disinformation narrative whereby any Russian opposition party, politician or even protestors are “puppets of the West” (see similar cases here and here).

Previously we have seen other similar narratives such as the West has an interest in the death of Navalny to launch a new wave of sanctions against Russia and West will falsely accuse Russia of poisoning Navalny, as with Skripal and Litvinenko.

Germany and France’s support to the paedophile, convicted by Russian independent court, is unacceptable

The appeal of France and Germany to release historian Yuri Dmitriev is interference in Russia’s internal affairs. The latter has just been sentenced to 13 years in prison for sexual violence against his adopted daughter. We view the move by Germany and France as an act of interference in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation and an attempt to challenge a decision taken by independent courts of the Russian Federation.

His previous activities have nothing to do with it. No one doubts these records of service in research on political repressions in the USSR, his conviction is a question which falls exclusively under criminal law. Appeals launched by Berlin and Paris aimed at freeing Yuri Dmitriev, convicted for pedophilia, are unacceptable from a moral and ethical point of view.

Dmitriev’s affair dates back 4 years. He was first arrested in 2016, and was accused of making pornographic images of his adopted daughter.

Acquitted two years later, he returns once again to the dock following a letter from his adopted daughter, where she details her ordeal. It evoked verbal and physical violence including sexual as well as weekly photo sessions.

On the eve of the announcement of the verdict, several photos of them which appeared in the investigation leaked to the press, causing outrage on Russian social networks.


Yuri Dmitriev is a "respected historian known for his uncompromising investigation and documenting of mass graves of the victims of Soviet repression in 1937-38 and Chairman of the Karelia branch of Memorial Historical Society in the Russian Federation," - according to the EU, and the pedophilia charges brought against him appear to have been prompted by his human rights work.

The closed trial on Yuri Dmitiev, who pleaded not guilty to producing pornographic pictures or sexual violence, was accompanied by a smear campaign. Recently, Russian State TV said: "Yuri Dmitriev did not find any Stalinist mass graves. He also did not prepare lists of victims of Stalinist repressions attributed to him. He has never been a human rights activist. A completely false image was created of him".