Disinfo: Results of the first round of Moldovan presidential elections were falsified with Western help


The electorate was driven to polling stations in the EU and the USA under all pretexts, and Romanian nationalists, violating all norms and even the criminal code, tried to block the participation of Moldovan citizens living on the left bank of the Dniester in the elections. Roughly speaking, the results of the first round were falsified with the active participation of Western countries!


Recurring the pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about foreign involvement in Moldovan internal affairs, including elections.

There is no evidence that Moldovan citizens residing abroad, particularly in the European countries, were brought to the polling stations in an organised manner.

There were indeed incidents at some border crossing points with the Transnistrian region on the election day. Several volunteers tried to prevent the alleged organised transportation of citizens to the polling stations. However, ENEMO International Election Observation Mission found that "observed irregularities in procedures during election day did not seem to affect the legitimacy of the process."

A similar statement was issued by the head of the CIS observation mission, Victor Guminski. "The mission came to the conclusion that the presidential elections in the Republic of Moldova on November 1, 2020 were held in accordance with the electoral legislation in force in the country, were free, open and competitive," said Victor Guminsky.

ODIHR's Limited Election Observation Mission in their preliminary findings have also stated that "In most polling stations visited, voting and counting was generally well-organized."

See here a similar case claiming that EU sent Moldova a letter of instructions on how to conduct the elections.


  • Reported in: Issue 219
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: EU, Romania, Moldova
  • Keywords: Elections


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

US Elections are clash of straight people and homosexuals

The 2020 Presidential elections in the United States are an ultimate battle between white, straight people, as well as homosexuals, transgenders and people of colour.


Pro-Kremlin disinformation about the United States in the context of the 2020 presidential elections.

The article was aimed at discrediting now President-Elect Joe Biden by alleging that his presidency marks the end of white and straight people in the country, as well as at downgrading the Presidential race to an alleged culture war.

The US-led Coalition against ISIS in reality supported ISIS and was complicit in its oil-smuggling operations

The US-led Coalition against ISIS (DAESH) did nothing to combat ISIS and was complicit in its oil-smuggling operations. ISIS was funded by exporting oil from Syrian oil fields in Karkuk and Deir ez-Zor that were under ISIS control. Thanks to the Coalition’s complicity, the oil was transported by tens of oil tankers from countries allied with the anti-ISIS Coalition.


The article, which was published in the aftermath of the terrorist attack at a church in Nice, repeats recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that the US-led Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS has supported this terrorist organisation instead of fighting it

This message is part of a broader conspiracy theory alleging that the United States and its allies have created and supported many jihadi terrorist organisations and control global terrorism.

Rights of Russian-speaking people are violated in the Baltic States and Ukraine

Why does Europe not mention Russians with ambiguous statuses in the Baltic States? The West speaks about the violation of the rights of Crimean people; they do not mention violation of the language rights of Russians in Ukraine.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin propaganda narrative about discrimination of the Russian-speaking minority and ubiquitous Russophobia in the Baltic states and beyond.

In this narrative, Kremlin-backed propaganda appeals to Europe/the West accusing it of double standards, the situation with human rights in annexed Crimea is presented on the same level as accusations of the rights of Russian-speaking people in the Baltic states and Ukraine being violated.