Disinfo: The SARS-CoV-2 virus demonstrates visible signs of human manipulation


The new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was analysed by Pr Luc Montagnier and the mathematician Jean-Claude Perez and it seemed unnatural. Some sequences of the virus were visibly added by human manipulation, the quality of the work is unremarkable, meticulous, impressive like the work of watchmakers.

The probable motivation of Chinese scientists was to design a vaccine against HIV and something went wrong.


One of many conspiracy theories about the origin of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. There is no evidence recognised by the scientific community that suggests the coronavirus (2019-nCoV) could have been man-made.

Professor Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine, quotes the study of Jean-Claude Perez, a 72 years old mathematician, which so far doesn't meet up the scientific standards to be published by a referenced Journal.

The work of Jean-Claude Perez has been published in a Journal that lacks peer-review and international audience among specialists. The study shows that very small sequences of the genome of SARS-2 are similar to some strains of HIV, but the coincidences are not significant given the small size of the sequences. In other words, these sequences are not insertions but are rather common sequences found in numerous other organisms such as bacteria and parasites. Therefore, the existence of these sequences in SARS-CoV-2 does not provide evidence of a link to HIV, nor that scientists purposely inserted HIV sequences into the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Besides that, the "cherry-picking" approach (keeping only the results that support the theory and dismissing results that don't) of this study also questions its value.

More generally professor Luc Montagnier defended controverted theories during the last decade and scientists repeatedly questioned his credibility. In 2012, 40 Nobel Prize winners signed a petition against Professor Montagnier, claiming that he "accumulates scientific and medical sham". In 2017, more than a hundred members of the Academy of Sciences signed another petition to denounce what he deemed as "dangerous". Alexandre Moatti, historian of sciences, reminds that many scientists who revived the Nobel prize later drifted into ideology or fake-science. Conspiracy theories often put forwards authority argument to be convincing and difficult to refute. However, the fact that a Nobel Prize laureate supports a theory doesn't make it true.

On April 21, the World Health Organisation spokeswoman Fadela Chaib stated that “All available evidence suggests the virus has an animal origin and is not manipulated or constructed in a lab or somewhere else.”


  • Reported in: Issue 195
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 17/04/2020
  • Language/target audience: French
  • Country: India, France
  • Keywords: coronavirus, Conspiracy theory, Nobel Prize


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

In Ukraine, doctors quit en masse because of Ukrainian soldiers with COVID-19

The medical staff of the city hospital in Mariupol quit en masse due to the hospitalisation of about 200 military personnel of the Armed Forces with suspected coronavirus infection.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Ukraine and the coronavirus.

The City Council of Mariupol told StopFake that the hospital mentioned in this news item doesn't have an infectious department ready to receive patients with suspected COVID-19 or even patients with the disease. For such measures, other hospitals in the city were prepared. Moreover, there was no mass dismissal, or quitting, of doctors in Mariupol.

Dangerous experiments of Americans in Chernobyl worse than fires

The wildfires lasted more than a week in the Chernobyl (exclusion) zone. However, it’s not the worst trouble in that region. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant found itself in difficult conditions because it lost contact with Russian specialists, the opportunity to buy Russian fuel and equipment. But the main danger is in the experiments conducted at the station by Americans.

Westinghouse is trying to get into Ukrainian reactors. They already got into Czechoslovakia, the situation at the Czech station almost ended up in a catastrophe after the Americans began to supply their equipment. Something similar is now happening in Ukraine. This is very dangerous. Much more dangerous than fire. Although fires are also bad.


One of the Kremlin's disinformation narratives about a possible "new Chornobyl" in Ukraine, the accusation of Westinghouse and so-called experiments of the West in Ukrainian nuclear plants.

In 2005, Ukrainian Energoatom and the US company Holtec International signed a contract for the construction of spent fuel storage. There was no such storage facility, and the country was forced to spend 200 million dollars annually for services for the export and processing of spent nuclear fuel to Russia. Construction began in 2017. According to the contract, Holtec International will supply special equipment for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel and its transportation, and will also provide Ukraine with technologies that will be applied at its nuclear power plants and also during the transportation of spent nuclear fuel from the plants to this storage.

The fate of Donbas is decided by nationalists not Zelenskyy

The fate of Donbas is not decided by Zelenskyy. The hegemony of nationalists has developed in Ukraine, and Zelenskyy cannot break them.


The recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the alleged power of Nationalists in Ukraine and their influence on the state processes.

All right-wing groups have suffered spectacular defeats in every national election since 2014. In 2019 the far-right "Svoboda" (often described as "ultra-nationalist" or "Nazis" by pro-Kremlin outlets) gained only 2.15% of the vote, far short of the threshold needed to enter Parliament. This demonstrates the public's lack of support for far-right nationalist parties in Ukraine.