Disinfo: Statement about Navalny’s poisoning aims to curb Putin’s desire to interfere in Belarus


Merkel’s statement about Navalny’s poisoning is a falsification. There was no poisoning of Navalny. They did it to curb Putin’s desire to interfere in Belarus’ affairs.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Navalny poisoning. Тhe message followed Angela Merkel's statement that "Novichok poisoning of Navalny was attempted murder".

The claim is a conspiracy theory that tries to artificially link Navalny poisoning with protests in Belarus and Russia's intention to "help" Lukashenko.  Consistent with the Kremlin propaganda narrative that the poisoning of Russian opposition leader is in the interest of the West to use the case against Russia.

See similar disinformation narratives that the West has an interest in the death of Navalny to launch a new wave of sanctions against Russia and West will falsely accuse Russia of poisoning Navalny, as with Skripal and Litvinenko,  or US hopes that the Navalny case will lead to the cancellation of Nord Stream 2.


Russian opposition leader and a critic of Vladimir Putin Alexey Navalny has been suffering from suspected poisoning. He fell ill(opens in a new tab) during a flight and the plane to make an emergency landing in Omsk, where doctors said he was in a coma and they were trying to save his life. Navalny has since been transferred (opens in a new tab)to Berlin and is receiving treatment at Berlin's Charite Hospital. Clinical findings indicate poisoning with a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors, said Charite.

The European Union condemned poisoning of Alexei Navalny in the strongest possible terms.


  • Reported in: Issue 210
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/09/2020
  • Language/target audience: Armenian
  • Country: Russia, Belarus, Germany
  • Keywords: Alexei Navalny, Alexander Lukashenko, Vladimir Putin, Conspiracy, Angela Merkel


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

UN recognised the Russian status of Crimean deputies and will cooperate with them

The UN demanded information on the issue of water supply and Kyiv’s blocking of water supplies to Crimea through the North Crimean Canal. The UN has recognised the status of State Duma MP Nataliya Poklonskaya as a representative of the Crimean people in the Russian parliament and will cooperate.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the illegal annexation of Crimea, attempting to paint a picture of international  - and even Ukrainian - recognition of the annexation of Crimea by Russia.

State Duma MP, former Russian prosecutor of the temporarily occupied Crimea, Nataliya Poklonskaya, claims that the UN offered her "cooperation" on access to water in Crimea. The UN refutes the interpretation of Poklonskaya about the attitude of an international organisation to the status of Crimea. The UN did not recognise the Russian status of the temporarily occupied Crimea or any Russian representatives from the peninsula. The UN  does not recognise Russia's annexation of the peninsula annexation. 

No evidence of Russian poisoning of Skripal

The Russian authorities have repeatedly rejected the Western accusations of the (Sergei and Yulia) Skripal case, noting that the UK has not provided any evidence to substantiate these allegations.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury claiming that the United Kingdom was never able to provide detailed evidence of Russia’s involvement.

Moscow's involvement in the poisoning has been proven via a thorough investigation. The British Police have presented a solid chain of evidence on the Skripal case, with pictures, connecting the suspects to the locations in the case. Parts of the material have been released to the public. The evidence was sufficient to charge two Russian nationals, Anatoliy Chepiga and Aleksandr Mishkin with the attack on the Skripals, both Russian military intelligence operatives from the GRU, who travelled to the UK using fake names and documents.

Navalny poisoning: The West needed a pretext to open sanctions against Russia

It is not possible to openly impose sanctions in response to the Russian-Belarusian rapprochement, it is too rough and strained. Thus, there was a need for a pretext that was sufficiently weighty to take measures of pressure. The perfect pretext is the poisoning of Navalny, which miraculously took place at the most appropriate moment. Navalny’s personality has become the trigger of sanctions pressure, and his fate is a direct signal to Moscow. It is not a coincidence that the German foreign Ministry issued a statement that the development of the situation with Navalny directly depends on Moscow’s actions. Pressure on Moscow is being exerted by the united front of the leaders of Germany, France, and the United States, primarily by the leadership of the democratic party and its “deep state”.


An unfounded conspiracy theory, suggesting western powers stand behind the attack on Russian dissident Alexei Navalny.

A prominent Russian opposition figure Alexey Navalny fell ill during a flight and the plane to make an emergency landing in Omsk, where doctors said he was in a coma and they were trying to save his life. Since then he has been transferred to Berlin and is receiving treatment at Berlin's Charite Hospital. The German federal government said that toxicological tests provided  “unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group” in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny.