Disinfo: USAID will sue several Moldovan mayors


The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will sue several local town halls because that money offered to equip the libraries with computers in the frame of “Novateca” project has disappeared. According to reliable sources of the Independent.md portal, this was the decision of the review team, located in Moldova. They verified how the project, financed by the tycoon Bill Gates, was implemented.

Sources say that the district of Comrat recorded the biggest losses: only some computers out of more than one thousand sent from the US were received there.


No evidence provided.

USAID's representation in the Republic of Moldova denied to Stopfals.md the information that it was planning to initiate legal proceedings against the mayors. USAID representatives commented:

"The Novateca program, implemented with the support of USAID, has improved the services and resources of hundreds of libraries in Moldova, thus turning them into real community and information centers, which have become vital for the given localities. During this program, USAID has established a successful partnership with local public authorities. Contrary to some news, USAID does not plan to initiate legal proceedings against any of the local public authorities, 

Regarding the "team of reviewers, located in Moldova to verify the way the Novateca project was implemented", USAID Moldova states that:

We have not evaluated any library. No audit activities were conducted, nor were there any violations. At present, there is a team of evaluators / researchers, who gather information on our programs in the field of democracy and good governance. The team will complete its activity next week. This is not a team of auditors / reviewers. The purpose of the activity of the given team is to study and research.

USAID provides assistance to strengthen Moldova’s democratic governance and economic growth. It helps Moldova implement lasting democratic and economic reforms that will improve living standards for all Moldovans.

Further debunking by Stopfals.md.


  • Reported in: Issue 175
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 19/11/2019
  • Language/target audience: Romanian, Russian
  • Country: Moldova, US
  • Keywords: USAID


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

There are no Russian troops in Donbas

There are no Russian troops in Donbas, Ukraine, and there were never any troops at all.


A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the war in Ukraine, claiming that Russia is not part of the conflict in Donbas, that Russia has nothing to do with the war in eastern Ukraine and that there is a “civil war” in Donbas. The claims are based on a manipulative interpretation of the OSCE report.

There is irrefutable evidence of direct Russian military involvement in Eastern Ukraine. The EU condemns the clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity by acts of aggression by the Russian armed forces since February 2014.

EU observers are passive when it comes to Georgia’s provocations

The European Observers are completely passive and detached in relation to Georgia’s provocative actions at the South Ossetian border.

The President of South Ossetia, Anatoly Bibilov, directly addressed the co-chairs of the Geneva discussions, representatives of the EU observers’ mission in Georgia, and asked for decisive measures to be taken with Tbilisi to evade the real danger of a military conflict. However, there was no response. Georgia acts with the connivance of its Western partners.


This message is a part of a larger pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign against the EU's monitoring mission in Georgia (EUMM), which aims to undermine the international credibility of the mission by questioning its impartiality.

EUMM is an unarmed civilian monitoring mission of the European Union, deployed in September 2008 following the EU-mediated Six Point Agreement which ended the August war. The EUMM has been patrolling areas adjacent to the Administrative Boundary Lines with Abkhazia and South Ossetia day and night ever since, to ensure that there is no return to hostilities and to facilitate resumption of normal life for communities on the both sides of  Administrative Boundary Lines.

Tbilisi, Brussels and Washington orchestrate massive information attack against South Ossetia

The goal of the “Tsnelisi provocation” is to destroy the concept of South Ossetia’s border. A massive information attack orchestrated by Georgia, the EU and the USA against South Ossetia is another attempt by Tbilisi, Brussels and Washington to question the political consequences of the war in August 2008. Supported by its Western partners, Georgia is refusing to accept the consequences of its provocative actions. The country is refusing to sign a document on the non-use of force and is preparing its forces for a military conflict. The aim of South Ossetia is to put an end to Tbilisi’s aggression even by joining the Russian Federation.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative targeting the EU's monitoring mission in Georgia (EUMM), aiming to undermine its international credibility.

The Tsnelisi  incident took place on October 24 when the EUMM monitors had been detained by South Ossetian security actors. The EU Monitoring Mission released a statement noting that the incident "happened in an area understood to be on Tbilisi-Administered Territory in accordance with the traditional interpretation of the Administrative Boundary Line in that area."  See previous disinformation case accusing EU observers of border violation and provocation.