Disinfo: Unwillingness to authorise Russian or Chinese vaccines is similar to the situation prior to the Munich Agreement

Summary

The Czech government is unwilling to authorise other vaccines apart from those provided by the EU to resolve their shortage. Not buying the Russian Sputnik V (or even the Chinese vaccine) is a sign of clearly ideological reasons and it seems very much like the situation in 1938. The Czech Republic did not trust Communist Russia and decided to rely on its Western allies – and the outcome was the humiliating Munich Agreement.

Disproof

This article is a part of a narrative claiming that European countries are “discriminating” the Russian Sputnik V vaccine. Such claims are false. On contrary, Russian and British scientists teamed up to trial a combination of the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Sputnik V vaccines to see if protection against Covid-19 can be improved.

The producer of Sputnik V has not yet applied for a marketing authorization in the EU (as of 9, February, 2021). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is in contact with the Russian producer of the Sputnik V vaccine and provides scientific advice. EU is not against Sputnik V if it can satisfy the same requirements as other vaccines.

The criticism of the Russian vaccine was not based on ideological reasons but rather on the development process. It was announced in August 2020 that the first Russian vaccine Sputnik V was approved, and the Russian Federation authorised it for widespread use. Normally, a vaccine would be approved only after the completion of phase III of clinical trials, the interim results from which were only published in The Lancet on 02 February.

It is rather inappropriate to compare the current vaccine situation to the 1938 Munich Agreement which permitted the annexation of the Czechoslovak territory Sudetenland by Nazi Germany.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 230
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 23/01/2021
  • Outlet language(s) Czech
  • Country: Czech Republic, Russia
  • Keywords: Sputnik V, vaccination, USSR, WWII
see more

Western spy networks target Russian teens to involve them in protests

The pro-Western opposition makes significant efforts to get them involved in protests. In general, the stake is made specifically on teenagers, with apparently full activation of the Western spy network in Russia. The scripts for these protests are written by people who are familiar with the peculiarities of adolescent psychology. They take into account the long period of quarantine, the lack of full-fledged communication, their hunger for action, the opportunity to throw out the energy accumulated over several months.

Disproof

Recurrent conspiracy narrative on "colour revolutions". The pro-Kremlin ecosystem excludes popular discontent as a genuine reaction to grievances and view them exclusively as instruments of powerful outside forces. “A colour revolution, instigated by the Anglo-Saxons/America/the West” is the reaction of pro-Kremlin media whenever crowds gather in the streets to protest against corruption, government abuse and curbing of civil rights.

Alexey Navalny is a prominent Russian opposition leader, head of the Anti-Corruption Foundation FBK, who was brutally poisoned by the nerve agent Novichok in Omsk, Siberia. Pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about this poisoning are mutually exclusive: "Navalny was not poisoned", "he could have caused the coma himself", "his friend poisoned him", "he might had been injected with Novichok in Germany", "Khodorkovsky is the suspect number one in attack on Navalny" and others.

Boycotting Damascus conference on refugees could lead to a new wave of international terrorism

The United States not only ignored the refugee conference held in Damascus at the initiative of Russia but also called on other countries to boycott it. This could contribute, in one way or another, to a new wave of international terrorism.

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming the West has been worsening the humanitarian situation in Syria.

No official data or evidence backs the claim that the US lack of participation in the conference is in any way linked to the rise of global terrorism.

The MH17 trial is faltering

The MH-17 trial is a show trial designed to discredit Russia. The trial is faltering, it is consistently being hit with new failures. This is a problem for them because certain conspiracies could be revealed, such as the participation of Western politicians in the downing of the jet, such as Barack Obama and Mark Rutte. The goal of the conspiracy was giving a casus belli to NATO to intervene in the Donbas.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the MH17 trial, depicting it as a scheme to cover up Western responsibility for it.

The MH17 trial in the Hague is not faltering or being hit with new challenges, it is proceeding as planned. The hearing on the merits of the criminal trial is set for June 2021. The pretrial stage was concluded on 25 November 2020.