The US bets on reducing the turnout in Russia’s presidential elections to below 45 percent

Summary

On a tactical level, our overseas opponents staked on the maximum drop in turnout and delegitimization of the results of the voting on March 18. They even set specific “planks”: to recognize turnout only at the level of no more than 45 percent.

 

     

Disproof

Conspiracy theory, no evidence given. Neither the US nor the EU stated their wish to reduce or assess the turnout in Russia’s presidential elections to below 45 percent.

Further debunking by Polygraph.info: www.polygraph.info/a/meddling-in-russian-election/29087414.html,

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 101
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/03/2018
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, The West, US
  • Keywords: election meddling, Destabilising Russia, Elections
  • Outlet: Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 0:50
see more

Next-generation nuclear weapons unveiled by Vladimir Putin in his state of the nation address have been designed with one goal: to save peace

What we heard on March 1 [Putin’s state of the nation address] is, perhaps, a scientific and technical version of the Munich speech [Putin’s speech in Munich in 2007]. This is a technological Munich speech. And how should we name the missile [next-generation cruise missiles unveiled by Putin]? It can be called “The Peacemaker”, for example. Because its purpose is to save peace. This is peace.

Disproof

This is not how president Vladimir Putin presented it. In the nearly two-hour TV film World Order 2018, Russian president Vladimir Putin tells host Vladimir Solovyov: “This is called reciprocal strike.” “If there is this decision to destroy Russia then we have a legal right to respond.” “Yes, this would be a global catastrophe for humanity but I, as a citizen of Russia and the head of the Russian state would like to ask you this—what do we need a world for if there is no Russia in it?” www.newsweek.com/putin-russia-nuclear-war-834553,

The US and the UK ordered the use of chemical weapons in Syria

The Syrian government has always refused allegations that it used chemical weapons, while now there is proof that the American and British governments ordered terrorists in Eastern Ghouta to use chemical weapons and then accuse the Syrian government of committing those acts. The orders were given to the jihadists of Tahrir al-Sam, Fajlak al-Rahman and Ahrar al-Sam.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about chemical weapons in Syria.euvsdisinfo.eu/smear-campaign-against-civilian-rescuers-in-syria-continues/,

No evidence supporting the claims. In November 2017, a UN Security Council-mandated investigation concluded that both ISIL and the Syrian government had been responsible for chemical attacks in Syria news.un.org/en/story/2017/11/570192-both-isil-and-syrian-government-responsible-use-chemical-weapons-un-security, .

EU and NATO’s war agenda exposed

Disgraced former minister Zijlstra stands accused of gross distortion of Russia’s foreign policy. Since the US and European-backed illegal coup in Ukraine in early 2014, geopolitical reality has been turned upside-down. American and European corporate media have peddled relentless anti-Russia propaganda accusing Moscow of “aggression” and “expansionism” in Europe. This torrent of Russophobia spewed out by Washington, the Pentagon, NATO and the European Union has created the worst crisis in relations with Russia since the Cold War ended nearly three decades ago. There are real fears that the mounting crisis could escalate into an all-out war involving nuclear powers.

Abominably, European government officials are willing to risk plunging millions of citizens into a war with Russia based on lies and warped, self-serving prejudices.

Disproof

Accusations of Russophobia are typical for pro-Kremlin disinformation. euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?text=russophobia&disinfo_issue=&date=,

There is no NATO war agenda.