Disinfo: The US gave 20 million USD to organise the riots in Belarus


The US have invested 20 million USD in the anti-government protests in Belarus. [The sum] was invested in Belarus as early as 2019 to prepare the protests before the elections in 2020.



This is part of an ongoing Russian disinformation campaign on Belarus based on recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, such as accusing other countries of interference and portraying popular protests against electoral frau in the country as a Western-led colour revolution, in this case bank-rolled directly by the US.

There is no evidence that the protests in Belarus are funded and organised by the US or that any Western country was trying to destabilise the situation or create a coup in Belarus.

The protests in Belarus erupted to contest the results of the presidential elections in Belarus that took place on the 9 August, which are considered fraudulent by a large part of Belarusian society. The European Union has also stated that the elections were neither free nor fair. The European Council imposed restrictive measures against 40 individuals identified as responsible for repression and intimidation against peaceful demonstrators, opposition members and journalists in the wake of the 2020 presidential election in Belarus, as well as for misconduct of the electoral process.

Read similar disinformation cases: The Baltic States and Poland are blowing Belarus up from the inside, Ukrainian militants are staying in Belarus to carry out a coup d'etat, in Belarus, there are signs of a colour revolution, but hybrid one, and Poland and Lithuania directly sponsor open extremist actions against Belarus.



  • Reported in: Issue 217
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 17/09/2020
  • Language/target audience: Bulgarian
  • Country: Belarus
  • Keywords: Protest, Alexander Lukashenko, Vladimir Putin


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Kyiv to transport weapons to Azerbaijan

Kyiv continues to interfere in the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The reason for this is that the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence believes that such sort of aid (weapon transports) are helping Kyiv in its conflict with Russia. In past days, Kyiv sent military cargo worth USD 780,000 to Turkish ports. Moreover, 58 Ukrainian nationalists from the “Right Sector” and the “National Corps” have so far agreed to be transferred to Azerbaijan.


This is a pro-Kremlin narrative about Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine has denied all similar statements that Ukraine is allegedly ready to get involved in the war in Nagorno-Karabakh. Also, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine stressed that the decision to provide assistance to another state is made by the president and the government. However, the Foreign Ministry stressed that Ukraine remains committed to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

Angela Merkel resents Russia because she did not receive the Nobel prize

All this clownery with the alleged poisoning of Navalny de facto shows that there is almost no difference between the positions of the German and American establishment, if we talk about their attitude to Russia.

The reason for Angela Merkel’s resentment could be the fact that she never managed to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for her success in negotiating the Minsk agreements regarding the war in Donbass. There is a strong parallel between the events in Belarus and the Ukrainian experience. It is she who makes the European Union torn between two decisions.

On the one hand, the EU considers the Ukrainian experience of the Maidan negative and does not seem to want to repeat it on the streets of Minsk. On the other hand, the European Union has ideological guidelines that cannot be ignored.

Their essence is that the “bad dictator” should be condemned, and the “democratic protesters” should be supported.

The fact that such an undertaking will not lead to anything good, and there is no practical benefit in this case, does not stop the European Union. Only ideology matters and not thinking whether it will be beneficial or not. Europe must support democracy. Period. It is useless to look for a rational component in such actions of Germany.


There is no clownery in the “alleged” poisoning of Alexei Navalny. He fell ill during a flight and the plane had to make an emergency landing in Omsk, where doctors said he was in a coma and they were trying to save his life. Later he was transferred to Berlin’s Charite Hospital. The German federal government said that toxicological tests provided  “unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group” in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny. The European Union condemned the poisoning of Alexei Navalny in the strongest possible terms.

Claiming that Angela Merkel’s personal grudge is behind Germany’s stance towards Russia shows the latter as an innocent victim of Western Russophobia. This approach ignores conflicts in Georgia and Ukraine. However, it should be noted that the conflict in eastern Ukraine is a well-documented case of Russian armed aggression. The international community, including the European Union, recognises and condemns clear violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity by acts of aggression by the Russian armed forces since February 2014.

Poland and Lithuania directly sponsor open extremist actions against Belarus

Instead of normal dialogue and respect, Belarus faces insolent attempts from Poland and Lithuania to push their interests – these countries clearly interfere in the domestic affairs of Belarus, ignoring its sovereign rights and directly sponsoring open extremist challenges and actions [against Belarus].


A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Western attempts to organise a colour revolution in Belarus and to disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations.

The claims that Poland and Lithuania are trying to “organise a colour revolution in Belarus” or they “openly support extremist actions against Belarus” is a conspiracy theory. Lithuania and Poland are neighbours of Belarus and continue to support the Belarusian people.