Disinfo: The US wants to discredit Belarus and the Minsk agreements


It is critically important for the Americans to show Minsk and Belarus as a territory that can no longer be trusted “as neutral”. Negotiations were conducted. And now you cannot set a foot there, after what happened [the detention of Russian citizens, Wagner mercenaries, and the accusations of preparing to disrupt the presidential elections in Belarus]. It was in the interests of the Americans “to torpedo” the Minsk agreements.


The recurring pro-Kremlin propaganda narratives about the Western influence on Belarus, and the Minsk agreements.

There is zero evidence to suggest any US involvement in the arrest of Wagner Group military contractors in Belarus. Also, there is no evidence that the US wants to disrupt the Minsk agreements.

In a joint statement by the Missions of the U.S., the EU and the UK, they urged the Belarusian authorities "to take the measures necessary to hold a safe, peaceful, free and fair election and to ensure fundamental freedoms."

See earlier disinformation cases alleging that the West supports genocide in Donbas, the US global "Anaconda" strategy is to limit the living space of geopolitical opponents.


  • Reported in: Issue 208
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07/08/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Belarus, US
  • Keywords: West, Protest, US presence in Europe, Minsk agreements


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Latvia, Lithuania and Poland prepare Lukashenko for the fate of Yanukovych

Latvia, Lithuania and Poland prepare Lukashenko for the fate of Yanukovych. Latvia, Lithuania and Poland have prepared a plan for Belarus to get out of the crisis. “Something elusively familiar in these lines,” recalling a similar plan to get Ukraine out of the crisis during the Maidan in 2014. “I was thrown like a douche,” the ex-president of Ukraine lamented later.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Belarus and the West. The title of the article is misleading. The article is comparing the agreement singed by Yanukovych in 2014 and the proposal of Lithuania, Poland and Latvia to help solve the crisis in Belarus.

The Agreement on the settlement of the political crisis in Ukraine is the document, signed on 21 February 2014 by the President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych and the leaders of the parliamentary opposition under the mediation of the European Union and the Russian Federation. The signing of the Agreement was intended to stop the mass bloodshed in Kyiv and to end the sharp political crisis, which began in November 2013 in connection with the decision of Ukrainian authorities to suspend the process of signing the Association Agreement with the European Union.

NATO troops encircle the borders of the Russian Federation

The Pentagon is increasingly and recklessly “holding back” Russia at the Russian borders. In the airspace over the Baltic and Black Seas, American scouts are simply put under the risk of fire. These are frank and irresponsible provocations with a view to transforming a conceptual conflict into an armed one.


It is NATO troops encircling the borders of the Russian Federation and not vice versa. Russia is forced to react – to build up the strike and defensive assets on the ground, at sea, in the air.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO allegedly pursuing a belligerent and hostile agenda against Russia, about the "Russian threat" as a false idea created and spread by NATO. An attempt to justify the increase in heavy weapons due to the allegedly aggressive NATO policies.

NATO is a defensive alliance, whose purpose is to protect its member states. During the Warsaw summit in July 2016, NATO has made it clear that "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia".

There is a plan of the capture of the Kaliningrad by Poland and the US

In September last year, the commander of the US Air Force in Europe, Jeffrey Harrigan, announced that the Pentagon had a plan to break through the multilayer air defence of the Kaliningrad region. In October a plan was published for the capture of the Kaliningrad region by Poland and the United States.


A recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on Western attempts to encircle Russia and Western belligerence.

Russian media has extensively misquoted General Jeffrey Harrigian's statements reported by the digital magazine Breaking Defense. During the press briefing, Gen. Harrigian outlined tactics the U.S. Air Force is developing in response to the ongoing threat of Russian anti-aircraft, anti-ship, and surface-to-surface missiles based in Kaliningrad. U.S. General Jeffrey Harrigian did not refer to any "plans" to conquer Kaliningrad. He said that "If we have to go in there to take down, for instance, the Kaliningrad IADS (Integrated Air Defense System), let there be no doubt we have a plan to go after that." If Russian aggression out of the strategically located Kaliningrad enclave required a US response, he continued, "it would be a multi-domain, very timely and effective capability that we would bring to ensure we have the access we need in that environment".