The West plans to use Ukraine as an explosive for a forthcoming war against Russia to take Russia’s natural resources for free

Summary

If there is a conflict […] between the US and Russia, or between the US and China, in this conflict Ukraine can really take part in a war against Russia.

Main aim of this war is to destroy Russia that has rich natural resources.

 Technically, Ukraine can be used as a seed, as a contact fuse. It will explode, and everything will start blazing. It could be Donbas, Crimea and everything else.”

[They want to ruin Russia] because then resources can be taken for free. Because in Ukraine now, some people demand free sale of humus, black soil – to buy it for a pittance.            

 

Disproof

Conspiracy theory, no evidence given. Repeating recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation that the West is robbing Ukraine's soil and resources. Further debunking by StopFake. For background see: www.dt.se/allmant/dalarna/ryskt-rykte-uppror-svartjord-fran-poltava-till-dalarna,

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 100
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 26/02/2018
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, The West, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Natural resources, Destabilising Russia, War in Ukraine, Donbas, Crimea
  • Outlet: Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 26:04, 27:32
see more

The Ukrainian Army has a plan to attack to attract the attention of the world community during Russia’s presidential election and the World Cup

You know, the situation that has developed at this moment along the demarcation line, indicates that some steps are being done and these steps are aimed at … – well, let’s say – … to create favourable conditions for a possible, let’s say, attack, possibly for the escalations. The number of provocations has increased quite sharply.

[…]

The first [reason why Ukraine is allegedly preparing an attack] is, of course, attracting the attention of the world community. This is what Ukraine currently lacks and it was demonstrated by the recent conference in Munich [on security] with an empty room for Poroshenko. The next one is certainly an appropriate time for any provocations: the presidential elections in Russia, the World Cup.

 

Disproof

Conspiracy theory, no evidence given.

Shooting during the Euromaidan in Kyiv was organised by former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili with the help of the US secret services and ‘Georgian snipers’

Alexander Revazishvili and Koba Nergadze went to Maidan on the orders of Mamuka Mamulashvili, former military adviser to Saakashvili […] They themselves were connected with Georgian special services controlled by Saakashvili. They were neutralizing the opposition.

It was necessary to create a stir. People should not stop. It did not matter whether to shoot a tree or barricades or those who threw Molotov cocktails. It was necessary to create chaos, so that the people would come out against the “Berkout”. “On February 10, 2014 the group was on the third floor of the ‘Ukraine Hotel’. Mikheil Saakashvili, Mamuka Mamulashvili, Andrey Parubiy, Sergey Pashinsky and a man in camouflage uniform. Saakashvili introduced him as a former US serviceman named Christopher Bryan. He had served in the US Army as a sniper.

       

Disproof

There was no coup in Ukraine four years ago. The demonstrations which began in Kyiv in November 2013 – called "Maidan", or "Euromaidan" – were not provoked from outside but were a result of the Ukrainian people's frustration with former President Yanukovych's last minute U-turn when, after seven years of negotiation, he refused to sign the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement and halted progress towards Ukraine's closer relationship with the EU as a result of Russian pressure. The protesters' demands included constitutional reform, a stronger role for parliament, formation of a government of national unity, an end to corruption, early presidential elections and an end to violence http://bit.ly/2ftv6iT.

EU´s CFSP might be voted in the majority, there is no option for the Czech Republic than to choose between Czexit or lose its sovereignty

The European Union might soon have a unified foreign policy that would be voted by an overwhelming majority and not unanimously as it has been up to now! The Czech Republic has no choice but to decide between the demise of its statehood or Czexit! If foreign policy is to be voted in the majority, we will lose our sovereignty for good!

Economic relations also fall into the foreign policy segment. If the EU’s foreign policy would be defined only by the majority, then it would be a policy that would suit Germany and France, less of the other countries, and for the Slavic countries in Europe, such a policy would be totally liquidated. The Czech government and the president would no longer be able to travel to Russia or China and negotiate trade deals there, as the new foreign policy of the EU would make that decision.

Disproof

The decision making process concerning the CFSP looks as follows; The European Council (EU heads of state/government) identifies unanimously the EU's strategic interests, determines the objectives and defines the broad thrust of the CFSP.Taking into account these objectives and strategic direction, the Council of the EU votes on actions or positions to be taken under the CFSP.
While decisions made by the Council of the EU require unanimity, some aspects of these decisions can be decided by qualified majority voting, which means 55 % of EU country votes, representing at least 65 % of the EU's population. eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Aai0025, .

The PESCO initiative is a voluntary structure eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-Homepage/34226/permanent-structured-cooperation-pesco-factsheet_en, .