Disinfo: There is a propaganda campaign aiming to infect the whole world with Omicron

Summary

There is an ongoing propaganda campaign to fool people into believing that the new Omicron variant is much less dangerous and that mass infection would actually be a beneficial outcome.

Disproof

An unfounded claim about the coronavirus pandemic, strongly implying that authorities and media are deliberately deceiving people into believing that the Omicron variant is not dangerous, with the ultimate aim of spreading the infection as much as possible. No tangible evidence is presented to support this claim.

On 26 November 2021, the EU’s European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDP) declared Omicron to be a “variant of concern”, just as it did for the Beta, Gamma and Delta variants. According to the ECDP, the risks of this variant are high. These concerns were echoed by Ursula Von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, who urged people to follow social distancing rules and “prepare for the worse”.

The World Health Organization (WHO) also designated Omicron as a variant of concern on 26 November 2021 and so did the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) four days later. The statements of health authorities, such as the ECDP, WHO and CDC, have been widely covered by media.

Read similar cases of disinformation claiming that the WHO does not cure, but cripples, that the US may be plotting a new pandemic, that the Council of Europe has abolished vaccination, or that the illegitimate Biden regime seeks to destroy Americans' health by dissuading American from vaccinating.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 267
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30/11/2021
  • Article language(s) Bulgarian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Europe
  • Keywords: coronavirus, vaccination, Conspiracy theory
see more

Disinfo: Russia is not a threat to Ukraine and is not involved in the war in Ukraine

The official representatives of Ukraine and NATO are constantly using anti-Russian rhetoric and misrepresenting Russia as a threat to Ukraine. Kyiv and the West accuse Russia of direct involvement in the war in Ukraine without presenting any evidence. After the coup in Ukraine in 2014, the new Ukrainian government has hypocritically claimed it does not want a war with Russia, while simultaneously pursuing membership in NATO.

Disproof

A mixture of recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the war in Ukraine, falsely portraying Ukraine and the West as aggressors and Russia as a benign actor.

The on-going buildup of massive Russian military forces along the Ukrainian borders are obviously designed to threaten Kyiv.

Disinfo: Sputnik V will neutralise the Omicron variant without needing a modification

Sputnik V will neutralise the latest Omicron COVID variant and has started the necessary studies. In the unlikely case that a modification of the vaccine is required, the new version of Sputnik Omicron can be ready for long scale production in 45 days.

Disproof

This disinformation story was published on 29 November, only 5 days after the Omicron variant was first detected and reported in South Africa on 24 November 2021. Although a number of laboratory studies on this variant are already underway around the globe, even scientists with early access to it, such as South African virologist teams at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg or developers of anti-Covid vaccines such as BioNTech, can’t expect to have reliable data sooner than in two weeks. Therefore, the affirmations made in these articles are unverifiable at this point and can only be considered as part of the pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that has surrounded the Sputnik V since the beginning. See also our reports detailing the use of disinformation and COVID-19 here.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives in our database, such as claims that G20 countries recognised Sputnik V as the best drug for coronavirus prevention, that Sputnik V is already available for more than half of the world’s population, that the West is waging a targeted campaign against Sputnik V, or that or that EU’s decision not to purchase Sputnik V is questionable since other vaccines may be dangerous.

Disinfo: The West is critical of the Sputnik V vaccine for political and ideological reasons

The hypocrisy of Western Europe is evident in its stance on the Sputnik V vaccine. Politicians from Western Europe acknowledge the high effectiveness of the Russian vaccine in private, but criticise it in public space for political and ideological reasons.

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about a conspiracy by the West to prevent the success of the Sputnik V vaccine for political reasons. In general, the notion that Western states are discrediting Sputnik V due to their anti-Russian sentiments is a recurrent disinformation narrative used by the Kremlin in its politicization of COVID-19 vaccines.

EMA started a rolling review of the Sputnik V vaccine on 4 March 2021 by application of R-Pharm Germany GmbH. Concerns were initially expressed, including by Russian scientists, regarding Sputnik V’s hasty approval in Russia before phase III clinical trials had begun and before publishing the results from phases I and II. Prior to travelling to Russian production facilities as part of the rolling review in March 2021, the head of the EMA commented that it was her hope that Sputnik V would receive approval and that the agency is “committed to applying the same standards and scrutiny to this review as to any other scientific assessments”. At the beginning of September 2021, EMA stated it was still waiting for necessary additional data from Sputnik V's manufacturers before it can authorise the vaccine.