Disinfo: There is no investigation and trials on Litvinenko and Skripals cases

Summary

What about the sanctions against us, regarding the Skripals? Nothing is proven at all. The same case with the terrible martyrdom of the poisoned Litvinenko. And who poisoned him? There is no investigation, no trial.

Disproof

Recurring disinformation about the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko and the Skripals.

In fact, both cases have been subject to the following procedures in the British courts.

On 21 January 2016, Sir Robert Owen presided over a High-Court inquiry into the death of British citizen/ Russian defector, Alexander Litvinenko. A report into Mr Litvinenko's death was presented. It found that two Russian men, Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitriy Kovtun, deliberately poisoned Alexander Litvinenko in London in 2006 by putting a radioactive substance, polonium-210, into his drink at a hotel. A few chapters of the report are dedicated to the responsibility of the Russian side. Amongst other things, the report says that "taking full account of all the evidence and analysis available to me, I find that the FSB operation to kill Mr Litvinenko was probably approved by Mr Patrushev and also by President Putin."

As for the Skripal case, after a hearing in the Court of Protection, British High Court Justice David Williams issued an approved judgement about what had happened to the Skripals around three weeks after their poisoning. See here for background information and summary of disinformation narratives about the case.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue184
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 22/01/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: UK, Russia
  • Keywords: Sergei Skripal, Sanctions, Alexander Litvinenko

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Paedophiles are striving for European political arena

Martijn, Dutch society of pedophiles, disbanded in 2014, planned to set up an organisation “Party of love, freedom, diversity of loved ones” in 2020. These dead pedophiles rose again and started to fight for the legalization of sex with children. They want to run in the elections to be plunged in this obscenity officially. Pedophiles’ lobby defiled everything in the Netherlands including the royal crown, therefore nobody is surprised that pedophiles front continues its activity this year.

Disproof

A conspiracy theory consistent with the myth about immoral West and pedophilia. Also, an example of generalisation and exaggeration as a method of disinformation.

The story in Georgian pro-Kremlin outlets is a direct translation of stories published in Russian media on pedophilia in the Netherlands. Identical narratives appeared on Ren TV, NTV, Vzglyad and others. Zavtra.ru even assessed the story as "pedophiles' attempt of state-capture."

Poland, Baltic states and Ukraine are Russophobic and anti-Semitic

It is not surprising that the events dedicated to the Holocaust victims memory were not honoured by the presidents of Poland, Baltic countries, and Ukraine. Volodimir Zelenskyy came to Israel but did not go to the world forum to combat anti-Semitism. The point here is not only the long-standing anti-Semitism common in these countries. All these states are infected with Russophobia. They are trying to present the defeat of Nazi Germany as a simple change of one occupation to another – German to Soviet. The thesis of a “war on two fronts,” against the “two totalitarian regimes” unites Warsaw and Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn. Kyiv joined them as well.

Disproof

A recurrent pro-Kremlin narrative on anti-Semitism and Russophobia. An attempt to depict EU member states and Ukraine as anti-Semitic.

Anti-Semitism is a tragic part of European history, and few countries can claim to have never hosted anti-Semitic sentiment. There is also no doubt that the manifestations of anti-Semitism still can be encountered in the European public discourse. EU and all member states have at several occasions clearly denounced anti-Semitism and committed to combating it.

Only activeness of Jews in America prevents the European Parliament from blaming Jews for WW2

Nowadays we are flooded with Russophobia. The European Parliament equated Communism with Hitler and that fact means that anything is possible. Who can guarantee that they wouldn’t be blaming Jews for starting WW2, had the Jews acted like we did in the 90s. Now anything is possible. It is only because the Jewish people are very active in New York, in the global finance, the fact that they are in the Congress, Senate and actively defend themselves [that this is not happening]. That is a signal to us.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory advancing recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the European Parliament and the resolution on the importance of European remembrance.

On 18 September, the European Parliament adopted a resolution, describing the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 23 August 1939 as a key element, causing World War 2: