Disinfo: There is no proof that Russia violated INF


The NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg did not give any proofs that Russia allegedly violated the INF Treaty. The arguments of NATO members, proving Russia has violated the INF Treaty, are on the level of: “everything is in the social media”.


NATO stated several times and provided details how Russia has violated the INF Treaty, for instance in its statement by the North Atlantic Council on 1 February 2019 and earlier on 4 December 2018 in the statement by the NATO Foreign Ministers. Back in November 2018 Jens Stoltenberg urged Russia “to provide details on Russia to make quick changes to comply in full with the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty. Stoltenberg called on Russia to provide details about a new missile system the United States and other allies claim violates the accord”. The NATO member – the US – also published a detailed report in February 2019 “Russian Compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Background and Issues for Congress” by the Congressional Research Service where they stated how exactly Russia violated the treaty. Read more disinformation cases about the INF Treaty here.


  • Reported in: Issue 144
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21/03/2019
  • Language/target audience: Polish
  • Country: Russia, US
  • Keywords: INF Treaty, Missile defence system, Maria Zakharova, NATO


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Ukrainian army is guilty for provocations and shelling on election day

The Ukrainian army tried to provoke militants of the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic” to return fire, in order to disrupt the electoral process near the front-line. Also, the Ukrainian army is accused of shelling Horlovka.


A recurrent, pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative around the elections in Ukraine. Unfounded claims on shelling, supported only by statements from militants from the so-called the “Donetsk People's Republic”. The shelling mentioned is not documented in any way. The report of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine does not confirm such statements. “According to the Mission’s observations, the situation in the regions of Ukraine was calm during the presidential elections”, the report says. Further debunking on StopFake.org.  

The U.S sponsored the campaign of Petro Poroshenko

The second round of Ukrainian elections will be won by the one who is told to win. It all depends on the United States, who invested a lot of money in Poroshenko’s campaign.


Recurring unfounded pro-Kremlin conspiracy theory about the Ukrainian elections. On March 25, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention completed the analysis of interim financial reports on the receipt and use of the election campaign funds by candidates for the post of the President of Ukraine. The report declares that Petro Poroshenko's election campaign funds are credited exceptionally from his election fund’s accumulation account. Examples of similar disinformation cases can be found here and here.

Lithuanian charges against the soviet soldiers in the January 13th case are trumped up

Vilnius has started court proceedings against the soviet soldiers, who in 1991 were trying to disperse the crowds that were attacking the TV tower. The charges are trumped up. The experts have determined that people died from sniper-fire and hunting rifles, but the soviet soldiers had no equipment like that. To this day it is not clear who fired the shots upon the protesting crowd. There was a third party involved. Lithuanians fired on their own people. It was the first example of a colour revolution.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the events of January 13th, 1991 in Vilnius, when the Soviet forces attempted to crush the re-established independence of Lithuania, killing 14 civilians.For previous cases see here. Lithuania proclaimed independence in March 1990. Moscow tried to foil the secession with an economic blockade. When that proved ineffective, Soviet troops still garrisoned in the capital Vilnius attacked its TV broadcast tower and sole TV station, killing civilians standing as human shields there. The events of the January 13th, 1991, and the offences committed by the USSR troops have been extensively documented. See also BBC reporting from 1991. On the 27 of March, 2019 the regional court in Vilnius found Dmitry Yazov, former Soviet defence minister, and more than 60 other former Soviet officers guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity for their involvement in Soviet aggression in Lithuania on January 13, 1991. The disinformation message is also consistent with the pro-Kremlin narrative about the colour revolutions staged by the West.