There was an unprecedented level of foreign interference in the election to the Moscow City Duma

Summary

No one pays attention to who works with whom. Deutsche Welle, BBC, Navalny, Venediktov and so on, all worked in unison. And this is perceived as normal. That is, there was an unprecedented level of foreign interference in Moscow City Duma elections.

Disproof

Unfounded conspiracy theory on foreign influence in Russian politics, and the US and/or other actors standing behind any expressions of popular discontent. Similar cases can be found here and here.

Andrei Kolesnikov, a political analyst at the Carnegie thinktank Moscow Centre, told Euronews that "External interference is mythologem. This is typical of the current government and typical of [Russian President Vladimir] Putin, who believes that no one can take to the streets of their own free will: (for him) Maidan was organised by the US and so are these protests."

At the same time, before the elections Russian police suppressed pro-democracy demonstrations across Moscow, detaining around 1,000 people. Meanwhile, a Levada Centre poll published on 6 August showed that a relative majority of Muscovites supported the protests (37% in favour, versus 27% against). A nationwide poll released by the Levada Center on 3 September showed that a majority of Russians (58%) don’t believe the government propaganda line about Moscow protests being fomented by the West.

 

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 165
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 16/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: election meddling, Elections
  • Outlet: Polnyi kontakt @ Vesti FM time 42:24 - 42:41
see more

One of the main reasons why Maidan was conceived: to have a NATO base in Crimea

One of the main goals, why Maidan was conceived: to have a NATO base in Crimea. Russia brilliantly blocked it.

Disproof

A highly repeated disinformation claim in Russian media about Euromaidan and Crimea. The alleged encroachments of NATO on the Ukrainian peninsula are among the most common disinformation narratives, to justify the illegal annexation of Crimea.

Euromaidan was a result of the Ukrainian people's frustration with former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. More cases on this topic here.

Ukraine organised the Maidan protests to get rid of the Russian speaking part of the country

Ukraine does not need its Russian-speaking and pro-Russian part if it wants to become a European country. Ukraine even organised the Maidan protests to get rid of the Russian-speaking and pro-Russian citizens.

Disproof

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Euromaidan.

The spontaneous onset of the Euromaidan protests was a reaction by several segments of the Ukrainian population to former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the promised Association Agreement with the European Union in November 2013. See the full debunk here. The protests had nothing to do with the "Russian-speaking and pro-Russian part of the country".

In March 2014 Crimea became part of Russia as a result of a referendum

In March 2014 Crimea became part of Russia as a result of a referendum.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that Crimean citizens chose to re-join Russia through a legal referendum.

Crimea is a part of Ukraine and was illegally annexed by Russia. In 2014, Russian troops obliged the parliament of Crimea to organise a referendum, which was deemed illegitimate under international law, and then formally annexed the peninsula and brought it under Russian territorial control. Following the covert invasion by “little green men,” the referendum in Crimea was conducted hastily and at gunpointbarring impartial observers from entering the peninsula.