Disinfo: Prisoners were sent to gas chambers in Finnish concentration camps during WWII


The Investigative Committee of Russia has opened a criminal case on genocide in the Finnish concentration camps in Karelia. It was confirmed that 14 concentration camps operated on the territory of Finland during the Second World War, through which 24,000 people passed. Of these, 7,000 prisoners of war were shot, buried alive or sent to gas chambers. Eight thousand civilians were also killed.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation message focusing on Finland and Russia's Karelia during WWII.

In October 2019, Russia's Security Service FSB released "secret documents" about the conditions in the Finnish camps. In April 2020, more documents were published, and former prisoners of the Finnish concentration camps asked the head of the Russian Investigating committee Alexander Bastrykin to launch an investigation into crimes of the occupying authorities during the war.

While it is true that Russia's investigative committee has indeed launched such an investigation, the media outlet in question repeats its questionable claims without challenging them.

As an ally of Nazi Germany between 1941 and 1944 during the Second World War, Finland established several prison camps in the area now part of Russia. The researchers have studied the treatment of civilians detained in the Finnish camps established in the Finnish-occupied Soviet Karelia in WWII, and nothing suggests Finns aimed at genocide of the Russian or Slavic nations. The word genocide is frequently used in pro-Kremlin disinformation, but it seldom corresponds to the actual definition of genocide.

The director of Finland’s National Archives, Jussi Nuorteva, told tabloid Ilta-Sanomat that many of the documents published last autumn revealed nothing new, as Finland had already openly admitted to segregation based on ethnicity in the camps but whether it was ethnic cleansing remains debatable. "The allegations of the use of gas chambers and the burial alive of prisoners of war are absurd. Nothing of this kind came to light in the Allied monitoring commission reports, nor in Finnish archive sources, memoirs or the many studies of the occupation of East Karelia", according to Jussi Nuorteva on newspaper Helsingin Sanomat.

The Finnish military regime in East Karelia has been studied extensively in Finland. The National Archives of Finland has undertaken several large-scale research projects funded by the Prime Minister’s Office and the Academy of Finland, on topics such as the deaths of prisoners of war, mortality in civilian camps under the military regime of East Karelia, the handover of persons carried out by Finland between 1941 and 1955, the fate of the Ingrians, and the participation of Finnish volunteers in the German SS paramilitary organisation in violence in Ukraine and the Caucasus. More than 20 research monographs and many scholarly articles have been published as part of these projects.

The National Archives of Finland published a database of prisoners of war who died during the Winter War and Continuation War and of persons who died in civilian camps in East Karelia. This database is freely available online at http://kronos.narc.fi/index.html. The search instructions are in Finnish, Swedish, Russian, English and German.

“This is not a new problem either for Finland or for Russia. The issue of responsibility for Finland’s military policy was carefully studied in court after the war. The Allied Control Commission, where the Soviet Union was represented, chaired by Andrei Zhdanov, monitored the trial. As for judicial issues about the war between our countries, they were resolved in the Paris Peace Treaty of 1947," the Finnish Foreign Ministry stated.

War reparations amounted to the US $ 300 million, and after all, Finland was the only country after World War II to pay all reparations in full to the Soviet Union.

Read similar cases in our database claiming that Civilians in the Finnish concentration camps in Carelia are victims of genocide and that Finnish guards were paedophiles raping dying kids.


  • Reported in: Issue 197
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 23/04/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: USSR, Russia, Finland
  • Keywords: Historical revisionism, WWII, Genocide
see more

Out of 3000 articles published by SouthFront, only 3 contain disinformation

Let’s take a closer look at accusations against SouthFront put forward by Euvsdisinfo, a propaganda unit of the EU East Stratcom Task Force. Since the start of 2020, SouthFront has released about 3,000 articles. Pro-NATO propagandists found a grand total of 3 (0.001% of the total) that they can use to back up their claim that SouthFront supposedly promotes some disinformation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.


EUvsDisinfo has no affiliation to any NATO structures. EUvsDisinfo is produced by the European External Actions Service and tasked with detecting, documenting and debunking pro-Kremlin disinformation.

In 2020, until mid-May, South Front is the source of 35 cases of disinformation. On some occasions, several cases have been detected in one and the same article - examples here and here. The disinformation has been published in more than 20 articles, of those, 17 have been devoted to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Euromaidan was a US financed coup d’etat to gain control over Ukraine

In 2014, the bloody coup was presented to Ukrainians as a “revolution of dignity” meant to bring prosperity to Ukraine. In fact, people [during Maidan] were used at the time as consumables to gain external control over the country… In 2014, Ukrainians fell under the external control of the US State Department, which financed the “revolution of dignity”, and then, for the future, started to finance all nationalist structures and permeated Ukrainians with hatred…


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives painting the 2013-14 Ukrainian revolution as a coup d'etat that was artificially orchestrated by Western intelligence.

The US did not initiate nor financed the 2013-14 Ukrainian revolution. The demonstrations which began in Kyiv in November 2013 – called "Maidan", or "Euromaidan" – were a result of the Ukrainian people's frustration with former President Yanukovych's last-minute U-turn when, after seven years of negotiation, he refused to sign the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement and halted progress towards Ukraine's closer relationship with the EU as a result of Russian pressure. For more cases about the Euromaidan protests, see here.

“Devaluation” of Victory Day means “devaluation” of Ukraine

Some forces intentionally tried to devalue the Victory Day only because Russia celebrates it, this meaning that Ukraine should not celebrate… The attempt to “devalue” Victory Day is an attempt to “devalue” the state of Ukraine itself.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative distorting the events of the Second World War.

Since 2016, in the framework of the law on decommunisation, on 9 May, Ukraine began to celebrate "Victory Day over Nazism in World War II of 1939-1945." The holiday replaced the "Victory Day over fascism in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945."