Language:

See all Disinfo Cases - Detail

Disinfo: UK to use chemical labs for new provocations against Russia

Summary

The UK is planning to preserve its chemical labs, including the notorious Porton Down, to stage further provocations aimed against Russia, unjustly accused of using a nerve agent — which the West calls novichok — to poison two Russian nationals in Salisbury.

Disproof

No evidence given. Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on the Salisbury poisoning.

The report's baffling suggestion that demonisation of Russia is the sole raison d'etre of UK-based chemical laboratories, such as the century-old Porton Down facility, fits the wider pro-Kremlin narrative of pathological Russophobia permeating Western government offices.

The story also asserts that the substance "named novichok by Western countries" does not actually exist, thus advancing one of the 20 contradictory pro-Kremlin narratives concerning the nerve agent (p. 37) and 138 narratives on the Salisbury poisoning in general (pp. 21-46).  See our debunking of the novichok-doesn't-exist claim here.

Read more on the Kremlin's framing of the Salisbury poisoning here, here, and here.

Go to search

publication/media

sputniknews.com (Archived)
  • Reported in: Issue145
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/04/2019
  • Language/target audience: English
  • Country: UK, Russia
  • Keywords: novichok, Sergei Skripal, Chemical weapons/attack, Provocation, Russophobia, Conspiracy

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Russia did not start the war in Donbas

It was not Russia that started the war in Donbas.
April 16, 2019
Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the war in Ukraine.

The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has stated that "the information available suggests that the situation within the territory of Crimea and Sevastopol amounts to an international armed conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation.  This international armed conflict began at the latest on 26 February (2014) when the Russian Federation deployed members of its armed forces to gain control over parts of the Ukrainian territory without the consent of the Ukrainian Government."

Notre Dame de Paris burned due to radical tolerance

Radical tolerance, brought to the point of absurdity and idiocy, same-sex marriages, mockery of the Christian commandments and feelings of true believers. Didn’t the flame of a monstrous fire hit and the world glowed over Notre Dame de Paris? Is this the light of flames of Sodom and Gomorrah? Is it a sign?

April 16, 2019
Disproof

The investigation into the causes of  the fire at the Notre Dame cathedral of Paris is ongoing. Divine providence is unlikely to be considered as a potential cause.

Recurrent Russian media narrative on LGBT dictatorship in Europe which violates the rights of Christian believers.

The Ukrainian regime was brought to power by a coup d’état

The Ukrainian regime is supported by fascists and was brought to power by a coup d’état with the support of NATO and the EU.

April 16, 2019
Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the Euromaidan.

The spontaneous onset of the Euromaidan protests was a reaction of numerous parts of the Ukrainian population to former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the Association Agreement with the European Union in November 2013.

don't be deceived, question even more

Share your feedback with us

DISCLAIMER

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.