Ukraine had nothing to do with the prisoner exchange, it was organised by the West and Russia

Summary

There is a need to remind that Ukraine is far from being a sovereign state and there is no need to talk about the merits of Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the exchange of prisoners. Ukraine is a node where the interests of Russia, the U.S., and the EU converge. And by taking into account the considerable influence of the last two on Ukrainian politics we can be sure that the exchange was coordinated by the Western “partners”.

The task was not to return the Ukrainian “heroes” who had been kept in the dungeons of the Kremlin. The real reason was to reduce the demonisation of Russia.

Disproof

This is a disinformation narrative delegitimising the sovereignty of the Ukrainian authorities and, in this case, their role in the latest prisoner exchange between Ukraine and Russia that took place on 7 September 2019.

The exchange process was initiated by the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on 7 August 2019.

“On 7 August 2019 I had a conversation with the Russian president Vladimir Putin. We agreed on the first stage of unlocking our dialogue and the first stage in ending the war, namely the return of our military and our sailors. We agreed to create working groups and we created them,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on September 7 after greeting the Ukrainian prisoners.

In the middle of August, Ukraine and Russia agreed to form a working group which would develop the exact plan of exchange. However, the key decisions were made by the Presidents of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.

"The working groups have been created and we have agreed that, within a month, we should speak very substantively, work hard, without lies, and bring our men home," Volodymyr Zelenskyy explained.

Negotiations on the exchange were held in complete secrecy, since both sides were fearing that any leaks could derail the swap.

Ukraine is a sovereign country. Its sovereignty is recognised by most of the world. Russia recognised Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity in a Friendship Treaty signed in 1997 but has been violating it since the occupation of Crimea and the start of the war in Donbas.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 165
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 10/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, The West, Ukraine
  • Keywords: War in Ukraine
  • Outlet: News Front
see more

Britain’s narrative on the Skripal affair is not credible

There is now more ambiguity and contradictions in the case of former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, calling on London to answer the questions previously raised by the Russian side. […] The political version of the incident presented by the United Kingdom was not credible, because there were many ambiguities and contradictions in the case. 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury claiming that the UK has never proved Russia’s involvement and has not provided any evidence.

British police and intelligence investigations have produced sufficient hard evidence to charge two Russian nationals for the attack on the Skripals. More British public documents and statements on the case can be found here. The investigative outlet Bellingcat has later revealed the identities of the two Russian nationals.

The USA supported an unconstitutional coup d’etat in Ukraine in February 2014

The US with its close allies supported an unconstitutional and armed coup d’état in Ukraine, in February 2014, when the Ukrainian opposition, under pressure from radicals and neo-Nazis, broke the agreement signed by EU members.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the belligerent West and its involvement in the war in Ukraine, stating that the Euromaidan protests resulted in an illegal coup, as well as painting the West as the puppet-master of Ukrainian politics.

Far-right groups played a very limited role throughout the Euromaidan, and did not initiated the protests. The spontaneous onset of the Euromaidan was an organic reaction by numerous parts of the Ukrainian population to former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the promised Association Agreement with the European Union in November 2013. The protesters' demands included constitutional reform, a stronger role for parliament, formation of a government of national unity, an end to corruption, early presidential elections and an end to violence as can be read here.

The “Green New Deal” is a fraud pushed by a lobby whose goal has been to dismantle the sovereign nation state

The Green New Deal being spread by London bankers like Mark Carney and Prince Charles which is really just another name for de-population.

This is the program which China and Russia have rejected under the emerging global framework of the Belt and Road Initiative. China is planning to triple its nuclear sector by 2032 to power its vast growth program and Russia’s ambitious nuclear energy program is tied directly to Putin’s recent decision to challenge the Liberal Malthusian order by name. Any nation committed to raising the living standards and productive powers of its people cannot tolerate a de-carbonisation or de-nuclearisation plan for even a minute.

Disproof

This claim is a conspiracy presented without any evidence. It is recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about climate change, following the narrative that global warming is a "hoax" perpetrated by special interest groups like green business that stand to benefit from climate hysteria.

The Green New Deal is the name of a set of legislative proposals introduced to the US Congress in 2019, that were aimed to remake US economy and eliminate carbon emissions and address economic inequality. The proposed legislative framework involved improving infrastructure, working with farmers to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, overhauling transportation systems, ensure jobs and healthcare for Americans and other proposals. Read more here.