Disinfo: Ukraine is not able to repair and modernise its aircraft without Russia, it is a safety risk

Summary

Ukraine has serious problems with the repair and modernisation of the Soviet MiG-29 fighters because of the sanctions imposed against Russia. The Lviv Aircraft Repair Plant reported that it lost the opportunity to acquire Russian spare parts for the fighter-planes, which is why it did not fulfil the contract for updating the aircraft. Experts note that the attempts of Ukrainian specialists to independently modernise the MiG-29 can make the operation of the machine unsafe.

Disproof

No evidence given for a safety risk.

There are no such words about anti-Russian sanctions in the statement RT.com referred to.

The Lviv State Aviation Repair Plant was accused of failing to fulfil the contract to repair two aircraft in time. In the press release it was mentioned that the plant is going to file an appeal to the court decision, as the company was forced to adhere to the norms of the law, that is: “to modernise the aircraft in the absence of spare parts, since the result of the above decision of the National Security and Defence Council created restrictions in purchasing them”. But there is no mention that the contract was not fulfil at the time due to the lack of details from Russia.

The website of the Lviv State Aviation Repair Plant, which is engaged in repair and modernisation of aircraft, including the MiG-29, notes that “we are separately proud of the promptly implemented import substitution program. It is about manufacturing parts that were previously supplied from manufacturers in the Russian Federation”.

Also in April 2019, the plant noted that the technological capabilities for the restoration of military aviation were expanded.

Because of the refusal to use Russian spare parts, Ukrainian plants have to find other channels to get these details. Because of this, repair and modernisation may take longer time than usual.

At the same time, Ukrainian sanctions in the defence sphere have had consequences for Russia, since the Russian military-industrial complex depends on Ukrainian enterprises in the rocket-space, aviation and shipbuilding industries.  Many parts for the Russian technology were manufactured in Ukrainian factories. A Radio Liberty investigation names a number of components that Russia has lost because of sanctions.

Read similar disinformation cases portraying the Ukrainian industry as failing and Ukraine as economically dependent on Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 157
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 25/06/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Ukraine, Anti-Russian, Sanctions
  • Outlet: RT Russian
see more

Belarusian state film studio is shooting Russophobic films

Belarusfilm (the Belarusian state film studio) is shooting Russophobic films where the following thought is clearly articulated and transmitted: Belarusians are not Russians at all, this nation deserves a nationally oriented state and their language is great!

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on alleged Russophobia in Belarus also questioning the latter's sovereignty. See a recent case on Belarusian sovereignty here.

The disinformation message appeared in the context of a recently released trailer for the film Kupala, about one of the greatest Belarusian writers of the 20th century Yanka Kupala.

Ukraine’s elected government was ousted in 2014 US-backed coup

The 2014 power shift in Ukraine was the result of a US-backed coup, which overthrew the country’s elected government and installed a pro-Western one.

Disproof

The claim advances pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives stating that the 2013-14 Euromaidan protests resulted in an illegal coup; painting Ukraine as a failing state incapable of making its own foreign-policy choices; and painting the US as the puppet-master of European politics.

The spontaneous onset of the Euromaidan protests was a reaction of numerous parts of the Ukrainian population to former President Yanukovych’s sudden departure from the promised Association Agreement with the European Union in November 2013. See the full debunk here.

Double standards in the MH17 and the Khashoggi probe: where are the sanctions against the Saudi regime?

The JIT report is flawed from anti-Russia prejudice and unsubstantiated “evidence”. It is based on hearsay and innuendo. This is a travesty of legal standards and criminal investigation. None of the Dutch-led probe has conformed to the slightest standards of criminal investigation and due process.

Yet the JIT’s unsubstantiated allegations against Russia and its collection of reports have lent political impetus for the US and its European allies to impose economic sanctions against Russia which have cost the country billions of dollars in disrupted trade.

By contrast, the UN report this week confirms serious allegations against the Saudi rulers for their role in the barbaric murder of a journalist. Jamal Khashoggi was kidnapped inside a consular premises, drugged, murdered and his remains dismembered, never to be found. As the UN special rapporteur asked this week: where are the Western sanctions against the Saudi regime?

Disproof

An attempt to apply "whataboutism" on the MH17 case, suggesting "double standards" on the two entirely unrelated cases.

The Joint Investigation Team has concluded that flight MH17 was shot down on 17 July 2014 by a missile of the 9M38 series, launched by a BUK-TELAR, from farmland in the vicinity of Pervomaiskiy. At that time, the area was controlled by pro-Russian fighters. The BUK-TELAR was brought in from the territory of the Russian Federation and subsequently, after having shot down flight MH17, was taken back to the Russian Federation.

On 24 May 2018, the JIT stated that the BUK-TELAR that was used to down MH17 originated from the 53rd Anti Aircraft Missile brigade, a unit of the Russian army from Kursk in the Russian Federation. The JIT reached this conclusion after extensive comparative research. An animation of this comparative research is available here.

The European Union and NATO have called on the Russian Federation to accept its responsibility and to fully cooperate with all efforts to establish accountability. On the basis of the JIT’s conclusions, the Netherlands and Australia said that they are convinced that Russia is responsible for the deployment of the Buk installation that was used to down MH17.

More cases on MH17 flight here.