Disinfo: Ukraine mines settlements in Donbas


Ukrainian army mines settlement in Donbas and creates obstacles for OSCE monitoring. Servicemen of the 3rd battalion of the 28th brigade planted 185 anti-tank mines on public roads and in the immediate vicinity of residential buildings in the village Krasnogorovka, without the installation of signs of mine danger.


This is the recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative against the Ukrainian army alleging violation of the Minsk agreements by Ukraine. No proof is provided about who laid which mines and when.

44 demining groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are involved in clearing explosives from the land. 29 groups work in environmental protection, 15 perform tasks on clearing the territories of arsenals, bases and warehouses where emergencies have occurred. In total, 38 demining groups worked this year, and more than 511 hectares, 329 km of roads were cleared of explosives, and more than 17,000 explosives were destroyed.

Moreover, the Netherlands' government allocated 4 million euro for the scope of the humanitarian mine clearing. Demining of the Ukrainian territories has been carried out by collaborating with The HALO Trust organisation which is specialised in recovering war-torn land from the explosive devices.

Also, the OSCE special monitoring mission constantly emphasises in its reports that armed formations of Donetsk and Luhansk regions often deny the SMM access to some areas adjacent to non-government-controlled sections of the Ukrainian border.

Similar cases also claimed that Ukrainian army uses white phosphorous and fires on OSCE patrol. At the same time, OSCE ignored wounding of three children in Donetsk as it is being told by Europe when to ignore shelling in Donbas.


  • Reported in: Issue 229
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/01/2021
  • Outlet language(s) Russian
  • Country: Ukraine, Russia
  • Keywords: DNR, Military, LNR, Donbas, War in Ukraine
see more

Special forces detachment "Berkut" tried to protect Ukrainians 7 years ago

Seven years ago, armed clashes broke out in the centre of Kyiv when militant-nationalists from Western Ukraine were brought to Kyiv and the special forces, “Berkut”, tried to protect Ukrainians.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Euromaidan protests.

The Ukrainian revolution started from the gathering of students in Kyiv after former president Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the EU Association Agreement. They were not 'militant-nationalists' who were 'brought to Kyiv'. The memories of participants are well-documented and it shows that there were people from all over the country who participated by their own will. Far-right groups had a very limited presence during the protests.

Navalny is used as an instrument by the Western special services

Foreign states are behind all the actions of the opposition leader Alexei Navalny; there is no place for such people who “betrayed the country” in the Russian authorities.

Today, Navalny is used as an instrument (interference) by the Western special services, the State Department. Everyone should have an understanding that everything he does is backed by foreign states. Our task is to prevent foreign interference, whoever pursues policy here, the country must be protected.

And if a person has betrayed the country, if he is on foreign funding, there is nothing for him to do in any government bodies. You cannot help him engage in politics, represent our citizens in different government bodies.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexey Navalny.

Anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny has long been the most prominent face of Russian opposition to President Vladimir Putin. His candidacy in the 2018 presidential election was banned by authorities over his conviction by a Russian court of embezzlement, which bars him from running for office. He has been arrested and imprisoned several times during his political career.

Navalny's arrest could be used by the West to impose new anti-Russian sanctions

The arrest of opposition leader Alexey Navalny after his return to Moscow from Germany, where he was hospitalised after he fell ill in Omsk, Siberia, has provoked a new wave of reactions in the West against Russia. Many analysts believe that this is part of a strategy to impose new sanctions against Moscow.


A new twist of a previously used pro-Kremlin narrative that the poisoning of Alexei Navalny (and now his return to Russia) is a secret project to introduce sanctions on Russia.

Contrary to the claim, which is not backed by any evidence, Alexei Navalny is an independent Russian politician, not a pawn of any foreign government. His decision to return to Russia is related to his refusal to become an exile and to internal deliberations of his political movement, not to any order from abroad.