Ursula von der Leyen is demonizing Russia to demonstrate her assertiveness

Summary

Ursula von der Leyen engages in Russophobia to show that the EU has a powerful and willful leader. A woman who was previously a gynecologist must show she is assertive.

Her, and the rest of German establishment, like all German aristocrats, suffer from the [German field marshal Friedrich] Paulus complex: they can’t forgive Russia for Stalingrad.

Ursula von der Leyen is either not well versed in today’s politics, or is consciously playing the game of many, which sells well both in the US and the EU: demonizing Russia.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the EU and Russophobia.

The disinformation message appeared in the context of Ursula von der Leyen telling media that the EU should continue sanctions to Russia. Read the interview here in German.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 158
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 19/07/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: EU, Germany
  • Keywords: Ursula von der Leyen, Russophobia
  • Outlet: Vremya Pokhazhet @ Pervyi Kanal [7:49 - 9:05; 12:06 - 12:45]
see more

Members of the European Parliament use Russophobia to advance their political careers

Anna Fotyga writes anti-Russian resolutions on behalf of the European Parliament in order to advance her political career. One cannot do that on pro-Russian position. Russophobia pays really well.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the European Parliament and Russophobia, combined with a personal attack on the member of the European Parliament Anna Fotyga.

The disinformation message appeared in the context of the European Parliament July 18, 2019  resolution on Russia, calling upon the Russian authorities to release without delay all illegally and arbitrarily detained Ukrainian citizens, including Crimean Tatars, the recently detained Red Square peaceful demonstrators of 10 July 2019, Ukrainian citizens detained on politically motivated charges and the 24 crew members of the Ukrainian naval vessels;.

Events in Crimea and Donbas in 2014 started because Ukraine decided to prohibit the Russian language

Events in Crimea and Donbas in 2014 started because Ukraine made an idiotic decision to prohibit the Russian language.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the annexation of Crimea, war in Ukraine and the alleged discrimination of Russian language.

The message is intended to distract the audiences from Russia's responsibility for military aggression in Ukraine and illegal annexation of Crimea.

NATO promised Russia it would not expand to the East

NATO promised Russia it would not expand to the East.

Russia has interest in stability between Lisbon and Vladivostok – not in wars. But Russia does not accept that NATO is expanding further and further eastwards. If one speaks of provocation and escalation dominance, it is NATO that is expanding eastwards, contrary to what was promised in 1990.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation that NATO had promised the Alliance would not expand to the East and that NATO is de facto aggressive.

NATO allies take decisions by consensus and these are recorded. There is no record of any decision been taken by NATO about putting a halt to enlargement to the East. Personal assurances from individual leaders cannot replace Alliance consensus and do not constitute formal NATO agreements. Moreover, at the time of the alleged promise, the Warsaw Pact still existed, which by definition could not mean joining NATO by them. Its members did not agree on its dissolution until 1991. This was confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev himself in an interview with Russia Beyond the Headlines: