US is behind Hong Kong protests

Summary

Johnson Yeung Ching-yin, one of the leaders of the Hong Kong protests, is a fellow of the US National Endowment of Democracy, NED. The supposed NGO he works for in turn works hand-in-hand with US and UK-based fronts involved in supporting Hong Kong’s current unrest and a much wider anti-Beijing political agenda. The direct ties and extreme conflicts of interest found under virtually every rock overturned when critically examining the leadership of Hong Kong’s ongoing unrest all lead to Washington. They also once again reveal the Western media as involved in a coordinated campaign of disinformation – where proper investigative journalism is purposefully side-stepped and narratives shamelessly spun instead to frame Hong Kong’s ongoing conflict in whatever light best suits US interests.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory presented without evidence.

Pro-Kremlin media have long used the narrative about anti-government protests being funded by the US. Examples include colour revolutions in post-Soviet states, the “Arab Spring” revolts, and Ukraine's Euromaidan in 2014. Western non-governmental organisations are often targeted by pro-Kremlin disinformation as agents of this subversive and state-driven influence.

The Hong Kong protests began in June 2019 because of a controversial extradition law that would allow for the transfer of suspects to face trial on the Chinese mainland.

For similar cases, see here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 163
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 10/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: English
  • Country: Hong Kong, United States
  • Keywords: Protest, Colour revolutions, Conspiracy
  • Outlet: New Eastern Outlook
see more

The international team that is investigating the MH17 accident has presented only provisional results

The international team that is investigating the circumstances of the MH17 accident has presented only provisional results.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the downing of flight MH17.

In September 2016, the JIT announced that Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile from the 9M38 series, which was launched by a BUK TELAR missile system. The system was transported from the Russian Federation to an agricultural field near the town of Pervomaiskyi in Eastern Ukraine, from where the missile was launched. After firing, the system - with 1 missing missile – was transported back to the Russian Federation. On the 24th of May 2018, the JIT announced its conclusion the BUK TELAR used to shoot down MH17 came from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, a unit of the Russian armed forces from Kursk in the Russian Federation.

Russia is not and will never be implicated in cybercrimes

Russia is not and will never be implicated in cybercrimes.

Disproof

Russian government-sponsored cyber operations and large-scale hacking operations to collect sensitive business and technology information in the US and Europe are  well-documented.

For example, in March 2017, the United States Department of Justice indicted two FSB officials and their Russian cybercriminal conspirators on computer hacking and conspiracy charges related to the collection of emails of US and European employees of transportation and financial services firms. The charges included conspiring to engage in economic espionage and theft of trade secrets.

US accused Russia of trying to meddle in the 2016 presidential elections without providing any evidence

The claim that Russia tried to meddle in the 2016 US presidential election is a “myth” perpetrated by Western media and by Western politicians despite never having been proven.

Disproof

The story is the latest link in a chain of denials which Moscow has issued regarding its involvement in the 2016 presidential election in the United States.

The fact of Russian meddling in the 2016 election was established by the US intelligence community already in January 2017. These findings were confirmed by the US Special Counsel investigation which found that "[t]he Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion" (p. 1). See additional debunking of the "no interference" narrative here.