Disinfo: US is stirring up conflicts around Russia aiming to achieve destabilisation in the post-Soviet space

Summary

The US media quite lightheartedly disclose that the US is aiming to achieve destabilisation in the post-Soviet space and indicate why they are doing it: since Russia dares reclaim the status of a global player and meddles in the world’s agenda, it will get punished by a ring of fire around the post-Soviet space. There are always smouldering internal conflicts and what [the US] is doing is stirring them up, no wonder they all went up in one go and are so similar.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory, based on a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the US presence in Europe and colour revolutions.

There is no evidence that the US is trying to destabilise Russia. The US State Department informs that "the United States would like to move beyond the current low level of trust with Russia, stabilise our relationship, and cooperate where possible and when it is in the core U.S. national security interest to do so. [...] The long-term goal of the United States is to see Russia become a constructive stakeholder in the global community."

Pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives frequently claim that popular protests around the world are allegedly incited, and funded, by the US and other Western states, including colour revolutions in post-Soviet states, the “Arab Spring” revolts, Euromaidan in Ukraine, protests in Catalonia and others. This narrative claims that protests, disorders, and civil uprisings are never manifestations of popular discontent but are “colour revolutions” directed and funded by the West.

See similar cases claiming that Ukraine is stirring up revolutions in Belarus and Russia under the control of RAND corporation, that Belarus is under attack by the unilateral globalist world to indirectly destabilise Vladimir Putin, or that the West's attack against Belarus is also an attack against Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 215
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 09/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Belarus, US
  • Keywords: Colour revolutions

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

We first knew of Novichok’s existence from American databases

The Novichok poison, which [Russia] was accused of using against opponent Alexei Navalny, is a Western product and Russia does not have it.

Novichok’s structure and mass spectrometry was first unveiled in the database of the American National Bureau of Standards in 1998.

Disproof

The story advances the recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the poisoning of Alexei Navalny, to distract and distort the facts, as they have done in the past in the Skripal case.

“Novichok” is a name that was given to a group of nerve agents developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s in a covert programme codenamed Foliant that was revealed by defectors.

Germany refuses to provide clarifications about Navalny poisoning

Moscow asked Berlin to present the results of [Alexei] Navalny’s medical analysis to clarify the circumstances of the case, but the German side has always avoided giving a response.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Aleksei Navalny's poisoning.

Germany has responded to past Russian calls for Navalny's medical samples by saying that Russia should already have all it needs after its initial treatment of the dissident.

In 15 years Ukraine could stop paying pensions to its citizens

The Ukrainian government is not hiding that current 40-45 years-old Ukrainians should not count on pension accruals. Earlier, the Prime Minister of Ukraine Denys Shmyhal announced that in 15 years Ukraine could stop paying pensions to its citizens. According to the experts, Ukrainian authorities might stop paying pensions much earlier, while Prime Minister’s statements represent an actual call to Ukrainians to “save money for retirement”, rather than hope for state support.

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about economic difficulties in Ukraine, presenting it as a disintegrating country that is ready to abandon its citizens.

This disinformation claim attempts to misconstrue the words of the Prime Minister of Ukraine, Denys Shmyhal. While speaking to the students of the Lviv Polytechnic National University, he said that if the existing pension system is preserved, it will become impossible to pay pensions in 15 years. However, in no way did he imply that the state will stop paying pensions to its citizens. On the contrary, during his speech, he announced pension reform, which would introduce a funded pension system in addition to the existing solidarity one. Read further debunking by The Insider here.