USSR is not to blame for the beginning of World War II

Summary

The accusations against the Soviet Union and Josef Stalin about the beginning of World War II are nonsense and pursue a purely pragmatic goal. The Molotov-Ribbentrop (Hitler-Stalin) Pact cannot be considered a military conspiracy between two dictators.

Disproof

The non-aggression pact between Germany and the Soviet Union, also known as the "Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact" (Hitler-Stalin Pact), was signed on 23 August 1939. Following the agreement, Nazi Germany and the USSR became allies for 22 months. The deal was accompanied by a secret supplementary protocol on the delimitation of areas of mutual interest in Eastern Europe. In particular, Hitler and Stalin agreed to divide Poland. The agreement also indicated that the Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, as well as Bessarabia and Finland, also belonged to the respective areas of interest of Germany and the USSR.

Just a week after the signing of the “Hitler-Stalin Pact,” the German attack on Poland started World War II. Two weeks later, Soviet troops entered Polish territory.

Read more about the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 160
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 04/07/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: USSR, Russia, Germany
  • Keywords: Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, WWII, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin
  • Outlet: Pravda.ru
see more

The West is to blame for the blockade of the North Crimean Canal

The blockade of the North Crimean Canal, which supplied water to the Crimea, was initiated in 2014 by the West as part of their anti-Russian strategy.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Ukraine and Crimea.

The North Crimean Canal is the only structure through which the Crimea received water from the Dnipro River. After the annexation of the peninsula, the Ukrainian leadership stated that Crimea’s debts to the North-Crimean Canal Authority of 1.7 million hryvnias for water use in 2013 remained unpaid. The resolution of this issue became one of the necessary conditions for further negotiations on the supply of water to the peninsula. Also, the main condition for the renewal of the agreements on water supply to the Crimea is the presence of legitimate authorities on the peninsula, which after the annexation in the Crimea are absent.

Kyiv is planning to disrupt transit of gas to the EU

The version that Kyiv is working on, to disrupt the transit (of gas), is almost confirmed. Almost every day, Naftogaz representatives say they won’t sign the new contract. Of course, they blame Russia for everything, but they make it clear that, in any case, there will be no agreement. And they are developing an action plan that will be implemented only if the transit is suspended.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative blaming Ukraine for the disruption of the gas talks between Russia and Ukraine and plans to cut gas transit from Russia to the EU.

According to Ukrainian National Security and Defence Council Secretary Oleksandr Danylyuk, a group to negotiate a new deal between Russia and Ukraine on gas transit will be set up after Ukraine forms a new government.

Wikipedia is paid to confront Russia

Russian philosopher and journalist Andrei Timiskov said: “Wikipedia erases information well and reformulates it to the satisfaction of the client.”

“Wikipedia” has been transformed into an information source, receiving “generous donations”, which are simply rewards for political tasks, culminating in the process of “sifting” the “unwanted” information. As for the donations received by the site, it is difficult to track them, as they are voluntary and the identity of the donor, either personalities or entities, may be withheld.”

 

 

Disproof

No evidence given for this claim. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation a nonprofit charitable organisation. It constantly publishes its financial reports online, and anyone can take a look at the list of the foundation's benefactors of more than $1000.

Furthermore, Wikimedia has a dedicated page for their "Transparency Report", where it sheds light on the requests it receives "from governments, individuals, and organisations to disclose information about users or to delete or alter content on our projects" and how it responds to them.