Disinfo: Washington did not provide evidence of Russia’s violation of the INF Treaty


Naturally, Americans are trying to justify their decisions and claim that Russia is a violator of the INF Treaty, that it allegedly “developed the weapon” prohibited by the Treaty, i.e. Novator 9M729 missile. However, there have been no serious arguments provided by Washington to prove their position, and, most likely, the accusations of having “prohibited weapon” addressed to troublesome countries have become a sort of a business card of the American diplomacy.


A recurring Kremlin-backed narrative denying Russia’s violation of the INF Treaty. See a similar case here.

NATO stated that Russia bears sole responsibility for the demise of the INF Treaty because it has produced, tested and deployed the 9M729 missile, which violates the Treaty. In July 2014, then-US President Obama officially accused Russia of testing a missile in violation of the INF Treaty, which prohibits the US or Russia from possessing, producing or test-flying ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range between 500 and 5500 kilometres.

The US and NATO have repeatedly engaged with Russia to preserve the INF treaty. In a joint statement released after the meeting held at NATO Headquarters in Brussels on 4 and 5 December 2018, NATO Foreign Ministers stated that "the United States has remained in full compliance with its obligations under the INF Treaty since it entered into force" and that "Russia has developed and fielded a missile system, the 9M729, which violates the INF Treaty and poses significant risks to Euro-Atlantic security."


  • Reported in: Issue 160
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/08/2019
  • Language/target audience: Belarusian, Russian
  • Country: Russia, US
  • Keywords: INF Treaty, Sphere of influence
  • Outlet: Sputnik Belarus
see more

WWII: There was no French resistance to the invaders during the first year of occupation

There was no French resistance to the invaders for more than a year. It’s not common knowledge whom the majority of the French actually supported.

Only one Nazi German has been killed by a French since the beginning of the Nazi occupation and it happened on 21 August 1941.


No evidence given. This is a recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about WWII.

Within weeks of the 1940 occupation of France, groups of men and women had begun to resist. Some collected military intelligence for transmission to London; some organized escape routes for British airmen who had been shot down; some circulated anti-German leaflets; some engaged in the sabotage of railways and German installations. French citizens helped to save Jews during the occupation as well.

The USSR tried to prevent the start of WWII, but Europe abandoned the anti-Hitler coalition

The Soviet Union made every effort to create an anti-Hitler coalition with European countries in order to confront fascist Germany. However, in spite of all the USSR’s efforts, Poland, France and Great Britain had signed the non-aggression pact with Germany, so the Soviet side had to sign Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, which was a forced measure.


During the so-called Moscow Negotiations, which began in May and lasted until August 1939, the UK, France, Poland and the USSR could not find a compromise to create a coalition. Poland categorically refused to let the Red Army into its territory, fearing Soviet occupation. The USSR also started negotiations with Germany in parallel and on August 23, 1939, signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop (Stalin-Hitler) pact, in which the Soviet Union and Germany divided the spheres of interests in Europe: the division of Poland, the Baltic countries, Finland, and Romania were agreed.

On September 1 1939, Hitler attacked Poland, Soviet troops entered the territory on September 17 of the same year. From September 3 1939, Great Britain and France were at war with Germany, creating an anti-Hitler coalition together with the expelled Polish government and other countries.

NATO jet intentionally provoked Russian jets over the Baltic sea

The F-18 pilot acted unacceptably […] There could be only one conclusion: the NATO pilot received an order to show “who is the boss of the house” over the Baltic sea. But it didn’t work out since our fighter jets warded him off. It was an intentional provocation.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO.

On August 13 2019, two NATO fighter jets assigned to the NATO Baltic Air Policing mission were sent to identify a Russian Tu-214 transport aircraft that was being escorted by two Russian Su-27 fighter airplanes over the Baltic Sea, close to NATO member airspace.