Disinfo: White Helmets have staged the use of chemical weapons in Syria

Summary

Syrian terrorist organisations, backed by the controversial "White Helmets", have carried out provocations several times in the past, staging chemical weapons attacks to blame them on the Syrian government.

Despite the monitored destruction of chemical weapons, Western governments again accused Damascus of using them in Duma, near the Syrian capital Damascus, on 7 April 2018. This attack was reported by the White Helmets, who released videos showing them allegedly treating survivors of the alleged attack. Although Damascus denied the act, the US, UK and France launched airstrikes against Syrian government targets, claiming that their actions were in retaliation for the alleged chemical attack.

Russian chemical and military experts later located people who witnessed the White Helmets' actions and who stated that there was no chemical attack and that members of the "humanitarian" force simply picked them up off the street, doused them with water and injected them with unknown drugs under the pretext of treating them for contact with chemical weapons. Despite their testimonies, the OPCW has not officially recognised the incident in Duma as a false flag attack.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the White Helmets implicitly denying the responsibility of the Assad regime for chemical attacks perpetrated during the Syrian civil war. No evidence given to support the allegation.

White Helmets activists have documented the use of chemical weapons in Syria, later confirmed by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Thus, the OPCW found reasonable grounds to believe that chlorine was used as a weapon in the Douma district of Eastern Ghouta, Syria in April 2018. Because of these awareness-raising activities, the White Helmets have become the target of a prolific and aggressive Russian disinformation campaign seeking to delegitimise their humanitarian efforts and paint them as proxies of Western intelligence to undermine the Assad regime.

As early as February 2020, the Russia Centre for Syria Reconciliation had already announced, without providing evidence in this regard, that it had evidence of the preparation of a chemical false flag attack in Idlib by the White Helmets. The White Helmets have been repeatedly accused by the Syrian regime as being responsible for chemical attacks during the war in Syria. To date, there is no evidence linking the White Helmets to these attacks.

Click here for more information about the disinformation campaign against the White Helmets.

Read more disinformation cases on chemical attacks in Syria here and here, and other cases claiming that the White Helmets used chemical weapons in Syria in order to accuse the Assad government; that The White Helmets are organising a false flag provocation in Idlib, Syria and that the White Helmets have falsified chemical attacks evidence.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 245
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21/05/2021
  • Article language(s) German
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Syria
  • Keywords: Syrian War, White Helmets, Douma, false flag
see more

Disinfo: EU groundlessly accuses Russia of interference in Western elections while pursuing anti-Russian containment policy

[In a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament] Among the set of standard accusations against the Kremlin there were unproven reports of "Russian interference in the Western elections", meanwhile there were calls to support the "pro-democratic society" in Russia and directly interfere in Russia’s elections.

Disproof

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the West allegedly pursuing a belligerent and hostile agenda to contain Russia. Consistent with the recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative denying any Russian responsibility in interfering in the elections of other countries, despite massive evidence to the contrary.

Russian interference in the US 2020 election has been established beyond doubt not only by US intelligence but also by law enforcement officials, journalists and researchers. Multiple attempts to influence the public discourse to favour one candidate over the other were uncovered throughout 2019 and 2020, though their ultimate success is disputed.

Disinfo: The USA and NATO will not defend the Baltic states from a Russian attack

The USA can come with the help [to the Baltic states] only if it lays in its tactical interest in the geopolitical game with Russia. Under certain circumstances, it may be unprofitable for the Americans to raise the question of “Putin's imperial aggression against the Russian neighbours", so even if Russia attacks, NATO allies will simply ignore the Baltic states.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on NATO and the US military presence in Europe - it claims that the United States will not protect its European allies if it goes against the US national interests.

Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty is the critical component of the Alliance – it assumes that if a NATO Ally is a victim of an armed attack, every other member of the Alliance will consider this an attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked. In other words, Article 5 is the cornerstone of NATO – it has been invoked only once in history as a response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Disinfo: The Memorandum of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia is NATO instrument to create anti-Russian "belt"

The Memorandum of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia is an instrument of the North Atlantic Alliance to create a kind of anti-Russian "belt".

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO and its actions aimed at encircling Russia, presenting every cooperation action for European integration, especially of the countries of the former Soviet Union, as actions against Russia.

The claim refers to the signing, on May 17, 2021, in Kiev, of the Memorandum for cooperation in the field of European integration between the Ministries of Foreign Affairs from Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, also called the “Association Trio”. The memorandum sets out a series of objectives for the cooperation of the countries associated with the EU and provides the normative basis for undertaking joint diplomatic efforts, trilateral consultations, public communication actions, announces the Moldovan Minister of Foreign Affairs.