Disinfo: WHO's reasons to paralyse the validation process of the Sputnik V are questionable


Investigators of the WHO who visited a manufacturing plant of Sputnik V in the city of Ufa as part of the validation process of the vaccine found several problems, such as the traceability of the batches of the vaccine, the filling lines, the guarantee of sterilisation and the handling of cross-contamination hazards. Those observers didn’t question the vaccine itself but some environmental and sterilisation aspects in its fabrication. However, the WHO announced that it would paralyse the validation, not of the visited factory, but of the whole validation process of the Sputnik V at a global level.

The WHO team stated that the procedure didn’t fully adjust to what indicates the so-called ‘Good Manufacturing Practices’ or GMP. Not every country in the world sticks to this protocol, Russia being one of those who doesn’t, not because they don’t have quality standards but because their protocols are different, not necessarily better or worse.


The information presented in this video is deliberately misleading. According to the preliminary report of the WHO inspection in late June, its envoys not only found the problems mentioned in this disinformation video but also “identified concerns with the integrity of data and test results of microbiological and environmental monitoring during the manufacturing and quality control activities” of the vaccine.

Experts have pointed out that this lack of sterilisation is no minor problem since it would be very dangerous to inject somebody with something that had any trace of bacteria in there at the filling stage, as the bacteria would multiply in the vial before it gets used.

Besides, the lack of adequate traceability means there is no way to know which batches do not match the required quality standards and safety measures. For this reason, the claim that the WHO could have invalidated only the Ufa plant and not the whole Sputnik V vaccine is fallacious.

The affirmation about the GMP is also distorted. The Good Manufacturing Practices are seen as a necessity by the World Health Organisation for medicines to be considered safe and are widely accepted throughout the world. While protocols may and do vary depending on the country, standards don’t and must be upheld in every case. The map showed in this disinformation video is also deceitful, as it doesn’t feature many countries that actually stick to GMP standards, such as Argentina, the ASEAN nations, India, South Africa, Chile or Australia, just to name a few.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives about the Sputnik V vaccine in our database, such as claims that the process of recognising it is artificially delayed, that G20 countries recognised it as the best drug for coronavirus prevention, that the attitude of Western politicians towards it feeds vaccine hesitancy in Russia, that the West is waging a targeted campaign against this vaccine, or that there is a political-economical-viral alliance to prevent Sputnik V.

This disinformation message appeared in the same video as the claim that “WHO follows certain interests and double standards in relation to Covid-19 vaccines”.


  • Reported in: Issue 262
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/10/2021
  • Article language(s) Spanish
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Russia
  • Keywords: Sputnik V, WHO
see more

Disinfo: Belarusian opposition prepares coup; foreign sponsors foster terrorism

The opposition is preparing a coup d’état in Belarus. Its foreign sponsors are relying on terrorism and extremism. Belarus is facing hybrid hostile activities; political, economic, military and information pressure on Minsk is increasing. Destabilising efforts are becoming bolder, more cynical and more sophisticated.


This is a recurring disinformation narrative from pro-Kremlin outlets, claiming that the West is using the Belarusian opposition to topple Alyaksandr Lukashenka.

It is also often claimed that foreign sponsors, particularly, Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine are involved in some alleged “terrorist” activities against Belarus.

Disinfo: Vilnius named itself a flagship of the EU’s anti-Chinese policy

China made it clear that Lithuania will not receive a single yuan after Vilnius named itself a flagship of the EU’s anti-Chinese policy and announced a “crusade” against Beijing.


Disinformation about the EU-China relations. The claim that Lithuania carries out a confrontational policy on China is ungrounded.

In 2021, Lithuania and Taiwan decided to establish mutual representative offices as a sign of advanced cooperation between these countries. In July 2021, the Foreign Ministry of Taiwan announced a plan to open its representative office in Lithuania under the name “Taiwanese Representative Office in Lithuania”. This situation angered the Chinese authorities, which perceived it as a violation of Beijing’s “One China” policy. In August 2021, China recalled its Ambassador from Vilnius, introduced economic sanctions against Lithuania and suspended the movement of the Chinese cargo trains to this country.

Disinfo: Concerns about “Russian threat” are exaggerated in Poland and linked to Russophobia

Poland's border is safe. The money for security would be better to use for the social sphere. “Russian threat” is greatly exaggerated.

The concerns about security in Poland are linked to Russophobia. It was evident during the “Zapad 2021” exercises. Then media in Poland discussed the possibility of a “Kremlin's invasion” but exercises ended and all military units of Russia and Belarus are back to places of deployment.


A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about alleged Russophobia in Poland.

The 2020 National Security Strategy of Poland states that the most serious security threat for this country is the neo-imperial policy of the authorities of the Russian Federation, pursued by means of military force (demonstrated by aggression against Georgia, illegal annexation of Crimea and military actions in eastern Ukraine). These aggressive actions of the Kremlin have violated the basic principles of international law and undermined the pillars of the European security system.