The Grimpen Mire – the treacherous marsh in the famous Sherlock Holmes mystery “The Hound of the Baskervilles” – was evoked by the Russian MFA’s spokesperson this week, as she dismissed the British parliament as a circus show in reacting to U.K. condemnation of the poisoning of Sergei Skripal. “The Grimpen Mire still holds its secrets”, she observed.

The Mire is described as “a vast bog that creates awe, dread, and a feeling of primacy”, and as having “patches into which one may sink with no guide to point the track.” As such, it is in fact an apt description of this week’s disinformation landscape.

Pro-Kremlin outlets went into overdrive in response to British Prime Minister Theresa May’s statement blaming Moscow for the poisoning and attempted murder of former Russian spy Skripal on British soil. Mr Skripal remains seriously ill in hospital along with his daughter and a British policeman called to the scene.

What was striking was how the stories – some appearing on the same state-controlled news outlet but completely contradicting one another – peddled multiple, unsubstantiated and often absurd conspiracy theories. This is perhaps the most classic of pro-Kremlin disinformation techniques: to confuse the wider audience and at the same time to feed a loyal audience of disinformers ready to defend Russia with abundant lines to take. The resemblance is very clear to previous instances when Russia was identified as the perpetrator of a crime: for example the MH17-case and the bombing of the humanitarian convoy in Syria.

In both instances, pro-Kremlin disinformation was quick to dismiss, distort, distract and dismay.

It was no surprise, then, that “Russophobia” was one of the top explanations given by Russian state-controlled TV in the Skripal case. This is one of the most common of responses to any accusation levelled against Russia.

Leading state TV channels in Russia told viewers that the former spy had in fact been poisoned by the United States in order to discredit Moscow and spread Russophobia; that the West was blaming Russia for the poisoning in order to justify sanctions and that the incident was a provocation by the West ahead of the Russian presidential election on Sunday. Sputnik joined in reinforcing the narrative of “anti-Russian propaganda”.

Another popular disinformation theme resurfaced when state-controlled TV suggested that the UK had staged the attack on Skripal to spark a boycott of the upcoming soccer World Cup this summer in Russia. This is not the first time that sport is used for disinformation purposes.

Tweet by @benimmo showing the similarities between RT:s reporting of the MH17 tragedy and the Skripal attack.

Following a familiar tactic used after the downing of MH17, Russian state outlets were quick to pollute the information space with “alternative” explanations for the tragedy.

Some claimed that Mr Skripal and his daughter had overdosed. Another explanation was that the exposure to the toxin was accidental and came from a British lab. In support, the same lab had its credibility quickly called into question by RT.

It was notable also that, amid all the focus on Russia’s use of such internationally banned weapons, a disinformation story should also appear accusing the U.K. among others of the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

But disinformation was not just aimed at confusing. It also sought to intimidate, threaten and scare – another common technique. The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated on Tuesday that Russia calls on Britain not to speak in the language of ultimatums with a nuclear power. This is not the first time representatives of the Kremlin have used similar language towards European countries.

In addition, Russian state media claimed that “the traitor had it coming” when reporting on the Skripal case. Many newscasts introduced him as “Traitor Skripal,” echoing the words from Putin’s infamous interview: “Traitors always end in a bad way.”

While other countries expressed solidarity with the UK Government, the Russian Foreign Ministry’s official Twitter feeds mocked the British government with the hashtag ‘HighlyLikelyRussia’, as catalogued by the DFRLab.

It can be hard to find your way out once you are in the disinformation swamp. Don’t step into it.

Further reading:

Figure of the Week: 20

Defensive disinformation as decoy flare: Skripal and Flight MH17

Behind the Smokescreen: Who are the Actors Spreading Disinformation on Ex-Spy Poisoning?

Salisbury poisoning on Russian TV: confuse, undermine and ridicule

Disinformation cases reported in the previous two weeks:


related disinfo cases

02.03.2018
Interfax
Russia, US
08.03.2018
Sputnik
UK, Russia
11.03.2018
Vesti Nedeli @Rossiya 1
UK, Russia
12.03.2018
60 minutes @Rossiya1
UK, Russia, US
07.03.2018
60 minutes @Rossiya 1
UK, Russia
06.03.2018
RIA Novosti
UK, Russia
08.03.2018
RT
UK
07.03.2018
Perviy Kanal
UK, Russia
07.03.2018
Rossiya24
UK, Russia
07.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 46:31
Russia, The West
07.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 28:16
Russia, The West
06.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 1:11:46, 1:12:10, 1:13:06
Russia, Ukraine, EU
06.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 31:02
Russia, Ukraine
06.03.2018
Mesto vstrechi @NTV TV-channel, 1:31:17
Russia, The West
06.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 39:59
Russia, The West
05.03.2018
Vremya pokazhet @Pervyi kanal, 0:50
Russia, The West, US
05.03.2018
Mesto vstrechi @NTV TV-channel, 33:53
Russia, The West
05.03.2018
Orientalista.hu
UK, US, Syria