Investigar
Cómo recopilamos el material
En la selección de trabajos primamos el equilibrio entre profundidad académica y reputación, sin por ello dejar de cubrir un amplio abanico de perspectivas e intereses más allá del ámbito académico. Tenemos en marcha medidas de control de calidad y la selección del material se estructura en las cinco áreas indicadas a continuación.
Esta área está dedicada a las actividades de los principales agentes ―es decir, Rusia y China―, así como a sus objetivos, razones y capacidades.
Esta área comprende los métodos e instrumentos que emplean los agentes de amenazas para manipular información: redes sociales, narrativas, tecnología emergente, etc.
Esta área se centra en los ámbitos sociopolíticos en los que se insertan las amenazas: cohesión social, procesos políticos, salud, seguridad y política exterior.
Esta área aborda los efectos de la manipulación de información y la injerencia por parte de agentes extranjeros en términos de resultados: efectos cognitivos, división social y política, proyección del «poder blando», etc.
Esta área clasifica los tipos de respuestas a la manipulación de información y la injerencia por parte de agentes extranjeros según las partes interesadas: reguladoras, proactivas y autorreguladoras, respuestas reactivas y recomendaciones políticas.
Filtros
A paper examining how the United States, China, and Russia are incorporating AI in their information warfare strategies and tactics and the implications of this trend for international security.
A study of the implications of AI-powered information warfare in the Indo-Pacific for regional and global security, inclluding recommendations on near term responses.
An analysis of hybrid cyber threats within the Lithuanian context, focusing on the examination of national strategies to mitigate them and identifying potential areas for improvement.
A study investigating the extent to which victimisation narratives in state information campaigns are effective in influencing external audiences, with a focus on Russia and China.
A short, pesssimistic review of the implications of conversational AI (eg, ’empathy bots’) on information warfare.
An analysis of the lessons about information warfare that the Chinese government is likely to draw from Russia war in Ukraine as viewed through the lens of US proxy conflicts.
A study of measures to combat Russian informationa operations targeting Ukraine and the Czech Republic covering three levels: government, media, civil society.
A report on the implications of generative AI for information warfare, arguing that the technology poses a potential national security threat in terms of the risk of misuse by Russia, China and other adversaries in social media manipulation.
An article on China’s use of information warfare to destabilise foreign regimes in the midst of a potential military or political crisis with democratic governments (drawing lessons from Japan’s experience during the Russo-Japanese War in 1904-05).
A study adapting ‘morphological’ theory to conceptualise social media disinformation threatening democratic processes along five parameters: spread strategy, information channelling, market targeting, presented source, and operational openness.
A report exploring the comparative success of Russia’s and Ukraine’s information campaigins arguing that the popular discourse professing that Russia has lost the information war is oversimplified.
A study of measures to combat disinformation, including resilience, regulations, public diplomacy, strategic signalling and counter messaging.
A review of ways that the United States could improve its capacity in information warfare against China, with policy recommendations.
A study of cognitive warfare and psychological strategies seeking to gradually influence the targeted public’s beliefs, opinions and perceptions with an empirical focus on the China-Taiwan relationship.
A study of asymmetrical information tactics through the lens of Complex Adaptive Systems that seeks to demonstrate how, by controlling the information flow during the Russian annexation of Crimea, Moscow applied complexity to the adversary on the one hand and stabilised the Crimean social system on the other.